Invalidity dossier

US 8108441

Efficient creation, storage, and provision of web-viewable documents

Current assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 4:57:25 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US8108441B2

Title: Efficient creation, storage, and provision of web-viewable documents

Patent number / application: US8108441B2; Application US12/427,552

Inventor: Matthew J. Ruhlen

Original assignee: Microsoft Corp; current assignee listed as Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC

Key dates (as listed): Priority/filing date 2009-04-21; publication of US20100268736A1 on 2010-10-21; granted 2012-01-31; adjusted expiration 2030-03-04. Legal status shown as Active. The source notes legal status and priority date are assumptions, not legal conclusions.

Purpose and plain-language scope: The patent addresses serving a document to a client browser without sending the entire document at once. A web server renders a version of a document into multiple "named objects" (for example text, images, or background frames), orders them in the anticipated order of access, and bundles them together with a manifest describing the relative positions of named objects within the bundle. The bundle is stored in bundle storage, such as a network cache.

When a browser requests a particular named object representing a portion of the document, the server determines which chunk of the bundle contains it. If that chunk is not stored locally, the server requests and receives the chunk from bundle storage, stores it locally, and sends the requested named objects to the browser without sending the additional named objects in the chunk. Later requests for objects in an already-retrieved chunk can be served from local storage, improving efficiency.

The description also covers sending the manifest and a document data file (plus browser-executable code such as JavaScript) to the browser; the browser may include the object's relative position in its request. A load-balancing server may route subsequent requests back to the same web server, for example using a cookie. Chunk size determines how the bundle is written to storage, including sequential files if specific byte-range reads are unsupported.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8108441](/patent/US8108441)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, complete specification, all figures, prosecution history, or a verbatim abstract ending; the abstract text is truncated at "additional named objec." It does not establish litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art, which were not researched.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:44:00 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8108441. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.