Invalidity dossier

US 7963687

Light emitting panel assemblies

Current assignee: Innovative Display Technologies LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 2:34:26 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US7963687B2 — "Light emitting panel assemblies" (source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7963687](/patent/US7963687)/en)

Bibliographic data (from the supplied excerpt)

  • Patent number: US7963687B2; application US12/724,039, filed 2010-03-15; granted 2011-06-21.
  • Priority date listed: 1995-06-27, claimed from US08/495,176 (patent/US5613751A).
  • Inventor: Jeffery R. Parker. Original assignee: Rambus International Ltd. Current assignee listed: Innovative Display Technologies LLC.
  • Status listed: "Expired - Fee Related"; anticipated expiration 2015-06-27.
  • Classification: G02B6/00 (light guides), G02B6/0018 (redirecting means on the light guide surface), G09F13/00 (illuminated signs), A61M21/00.
  • Other version: US20100172151A1.

Purpose and plain-language scope
The patent concerns light emitting panel assemblies. The listed prior-art keywords are "light," "emitting panel," "light emitting," "panel member," and "major surface," indicating a panel member with a major surface through which light is emitted. Classifications further indicate a planar/plate-like light guide with means for coupling light in from a source and redirecting means on the light guide's surface. Keyword-frequency data in the excerpt lists, among terms appearing in the claims/abstract, "liquid crystal," "optical film," and "optical effect," and among description terms "transition," "film," "distribution," "coating," "adhesive," "colorant," and "ink." Google Patents also lists litigation entries (Texas Eastern District Court cases 2:14-cv-00142, -00145 and -00146) and assignments dated 2013.

What the excerpt does not establish
The supplied text contains no claim language, no written description, and no abstract, so it does not establish the actual claimed scope, the specific embodiments, the intended applications, or the meaning of any term beyond the keyword and classification data above. It also does not establish the accuracy or legal effect of the listed priority date, status, assignee, or litigation records — the source itself labels status, priority, and assignee data as assumptions or non-conclusions. Nothing here is evidence of validity, infringement, ownership, or prior art. No further detail should be inferred beyond the excerpt.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:12 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7963687. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.