Invalidity dossier

US 7894611

Spatial disassembly processor

Current assignee: Bose Corp

Added 9/23/2026, 11:27:36 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,894,611 B2

Title: Spatial disassembly processor
Assignee: Bose Corporation (original assignee Bose Corp)
Inventors: Paul E. Beckmann; Finn A. Arnold
Priority date: 1994-04-15
Filing date: 2009-12-07 (application US12/631,911)
Publication: US20100086136A1 (2010-04-08); granted 2011-02-22
Status as listed: Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2014-04-15
Classification: H04S7/00, H04S7/30 (control circuits for electronic adaptation of the sound field)

Purpose: The invention "relates to a method and apparatus for spatially disassembling signals, such as stereo audio signals, to produce additional signal channels." Spatial disassembly separates the information in the two channels of a stereo signal to produce additional channels while preserving the original spatial distribution. The patent distinguishes prior linear (dematrixing) and steered approaches, noting the latter operate "on audio at a macroscopic level" and require temporal separation. The stated distinguishing characteristic is that input channels "are split into a multitude of frequency components, and steering occurs on a frequency by frequency basis."

Plain-language scope: A pair of input signals L(t) and R(t) is decomposed into subband representations (e.g., via a short-term Fourier transform) and processed to form N output channel signals o1(t)…oN(t). A construction rule fj,k(·) is defined so that, when reproduced over N spatially separated loudspeakers, a perceived loudness and perceived location of the kth subband match those of the input signals reproduced over a pair of speakers. In the described embodiment, a 2-to-3 channel processor yields left, center, and right outputs using overlapping windowed blocks (P = 2048 samples, half-block overlap), zero padding, FFT to 4096 coefficients, spatial disassembly processing, inverse FFT, windowing, and overlap-add. Spectral and spatial balance constraints are given, with a blend factor α that is frequency dependent (no processing below 250 Hz; constant B above 1 kHz).

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides only a partial text; the claims, complete equations, detailed processing rules, and the full specification are omitted. Legal status is stated as an assumption, not a legal conclusion. No litigation, ownership transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is included or implied.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7894611/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:32:42 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7894611. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.