Invalidity dossier

US 7865557

System and method for verifying delivery and integrity of electronic messages

Current assignee: Rpost Communications Ltd

Added 9/23/2026, 8:36:37 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,865,557 B2

Title: System and method for verifying delivery and integrity of electronic messages

Patent number: US7865557B2 | Application: US11/725,210 | Filed: 2007-03-16 | Granted/Published: 2011-01-04 | Priority date: 1999-07-28 | Inventor: Terrance A. Tomkow | Original assignee: RPost International Ltd | Current assignee (as listed): Rpost Communications Ltd | Status: Expired – Lifetime, adjusted expiration 2020-10-30.

Purpose. The patent addresses a long-recognized problem: ordinary e-mail receipts are weak evidence because they "may be just another e-mail message that could have been altered or created by anyone, at any time." The stated object is to "reliably verify[] via secure and tamper-proof documentation the content and delivery of an electronic message such as an e-mail," giving e-mail "a legal status on a par with, if not superior to, that of registered United States mail."

Plain-language scope (per the excerpt). An originator sends a copy of an electronic message to a system, or composes it within the system. The system creates and records a digital signature of each message — e.g., by hash function producing a message digest, then encrypting the digest — with separate signatures possible for the body, attachments, and the overall message. The system forwards the message to recipients (including "to" and "cc" addressees) and returns a receipt containing the original message, the digital signature, and a handshaking and delivery history with delivery times. Later, the originator submits the receipt back to the system, which verifies that the signature matches the original message and the rest of the receipt; on a match, the system issues a letter or other confirmation of authenticity that the message has not been altered. The excerpt also characterizes the invention as a method including "receiving from a sender across a computer network an electronic message, the message having a delivery address associated therewith; computing a message digest according to the mes[sage]…" (truncated in the source).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7865557/en

What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text is explicitly an excerpt with omitted material; the full claim set, claim numbering, dependencies, and the complete limitations of the appended claims are not reproduced here. It also omits the detailed description, drawing descriptions, and any specific embodiments. Accordingly, no statement of exact claim scope, claim count, or infringement position can be grounded in this text alone. Bibliographic fields and legal-status entries are as listed by the source and are labeled there as assumptions, not legal conclusions.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:41:18 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7865557. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.