Invalidity dossier

US 7723910

Method of photodynamically diagnosing or treating a contoured surface

Current assignee: Dusa Pharmaceuticals Inc Canada

Added 8/27/2026, 7:52:37 AM

IndustryMedical (M)
At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on fileMedical (M)

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Auto-generating section 1 of 7: Litigation summary

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Summary of U.S. Patent No. 7,723,910 B2

I searched the USPTO database sources (Google Patents, uspto.report, FreePatentsOnline, PubChem) and for CAFC 2026 dockets. Here is what I can confirm with high confidence, followed by what I could not confirm.

Bibliographic data (verified across multiple sources)

Field Value
Patent number US 7,723,910 B2
Title Method of photodynamically diagnosing or treating a contoured surface
Application US 11/716,014 (filed March 9, 2007)
Issue date May 25, 2010
Priority date May 1, 1998 (earliest in family)
Inventors Scott Lundahl; Rebecca Kozodoy; Ronald Carroll; Elton Leppelmeier
Assignee DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Google Patents also lists DUSA Pharmaceuticals Inc Canada as a current assignee)
Status Expired – Fee Related; adjusted expiration listed as June 17, 2019
Type Continuation of U.S. 10/755,318 (issued as 7,190,109), which is a divisional of U.S. 09/774,084 (issued as 6,709,446), which is a divisional of U.S. 09/070,772 (issued as 6,223,071)

Abstract (verbatim): "A method of photodynamically diagnosing or treating a contoured surface includes topically applying 5-aminolevulinic acid to the contoured surface and irradiating the contoured surface with substantially uniform intensity visible light from a plurality of light sources generally conforming to the contoured surface. The plurality of light sources may comprise fluorescent tubes."

Independent claims (plain-language overview)

The patent has 26 claims; the independent claims are 1, 24, and 26, each directed to a method (not an apparatus). All three share the same preamble/body — topically applying 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) to a contoured (non-planar) surface, and irradiating that surface with substantially uniform-intensity visible light from a plurality of light sources that generally conform to the surface's contour — and differ in the limitation that closes each claim:

  • Claim 1 — Requires that the plurality of light sources comprises fluorescent tubes. This is the broadest independent claim, covering PDT or photodynamic diagnosis (PD) using ALA and a contour-conforming array of fluorescent tubes.

  • Claim 24 — Requires that the contoured surface is irradiated with light substantially entirely within the blue region of the spectrum (no requirement that the sources be fluorescent tubes).

  • Claim 26 — Requires specific irradiation parameters: approximately 1000 seconds of light having a nominal peak wavelength of 417 ± 5 nm and a nominal bandwidth of 30 nm (this corresponds to the specification's preferred "Ultra Blue" Sr₂P₂O₇:Eu phosphor dose of ~10 J/cm² at ~10 mW/cm²).

Dependent claims (2–23, 25) add conventional limitations: ALA in a carrier (claim 2); successive applications (claim 3); treatment of specific indications — actinic keratosis (4), acne (6), photo damaged skin (8), cancer (10), warts (12), psoriasis (14), hair removal (16), cancer diagnosis (18), and pre-cancerous conditions (20); and admixing ALA with a vehicle just prior to use (claims 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 22, 25). Claim 23 adds the blue-region limitation to claim 1.

Litigation / CAFC 2026 docket search — uncertainty noted

  • No CAFC docket specific to patent 7,723,910 was found in my searches of 2026 (or recent) Federal Circuit dockets. My queries for a 2026 CAFC appeal returned no results, so I cannot confirm any pending CAFC proceeding involving this exact patent number.
  • The Google Patents family page flags that the family "has litigation" (Darts-ip family ID 5472388), and the DUSA v. Biofrontera case (D. Mass., No. 1:18-cv-10568; Sun Pharma/DUSA as plaintiff) is the notable family litigation. However, that case asserted the child patents 8,216,289 and 9,723,991 (titled "Illuminator for Photodynamic Therapy"), not 7,723,910 itself. The district court (Stearns, J.) denied Biofrontera's invalidity summary-judgment motion and partially granted DUSA's in 2020.
  • Given the '910 patent's June 2019 adjusted expiration, any 2026 CAFC appeal would most plausibly concern damages or an ongoing related dispute rather than infringement of the '910 patent itself, but I have no authoritative confirmation of such a docket.

Bottom line: The '910 patent is a method patent covering topical ALA-based photodynamic therapy/diagnosis of contoured body surfaces (e.g., face/scalp) using contour-conforming, uniform-intensity visible light sources — preferably U-shaped blue fluorescent tubes peaking at ~417 nm. No CAFC 2026 docket for this specific patent was located; that portion of your request is unconfirmed rather than definitively negative.

Generated 8/27/2026, 7:53:01 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7723910. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Keep exploring

Other patents in Medical (M)

See all Medical (M) patents →