Invalidity dossier

US 7720966

Arrangements and method for hierarchical resource management in a layered network architecture

Current assignee: NetSocket Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 7:28:18 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 7,720,966 B2

Title: "Arrangements and method for hierarchical resource management in a layered network architecture"

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7720966/en (excerpt)

Identifiers and dates: Publication number US7720966B2; application US10/535,208; filing date 2003-11-14; priority date 2002-12-02; publication date 2010-05-18. Legal status is listed as expired – lifetime, with adjusted expiration 2024-09-07. The source states legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion.

Assignee: Current assignee listed as NetSocket Inc; original assignee NetSocket Inc. The excerpt also lists reassignments involving Operax AB, NYA Operax AB, Comerica Bank, and Alliacense Limited LLC, reflecting recorded assignments rather than analyzed ownership.

Inventors: Ulf Bodin, Joachim Johansson, Joakim Norrgard, Fredrik Pettersson, Olov Schelen, Jim Sundqvist, Emil Svanberg.

Purpose: The invention relates to resource management in a data network having a layered network architecture. The excerpt discusses IP as a unifying network layer in increasingly heterogeneous environments (application, link-layer, user-community, and business heterogeneity), and describes the Network Resource Manager (NRM) — also called bandwidth broker, bandwidth manager, network resource controller, or network agent — as the entity performing dynamic service management that tracks available resources, stores a history of admitted reservations, and performs admission control based on total, reserved, and requested resources. The background surveys inter-domain QoS signaling (SIBBS, BGRP), Cadenus resource mediation, NSIS, SBM, and criticizes proposed solutions as providing either single-level IP resource management or strict link-level resource management rather than uniform resource management spanning applications, overlay networks, and link-layer technologies.

Plain-language scope: Resource management is organized hierarchically across layered networks, providing a uniform way for operators to manage services at IP level and within link-layer networks, with admission control decisions made by resource managers against tracked reservations.

What the excerpt does not establish: It contains no claim language, specification details, drawings, or prosecution history, so the actual claimed scope, embodiments, and limitations cannot be determined here. It also does not establish validity, enforceability, infringement, or the correctness of recorded assignments.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:03 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7720966. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.