Invalidity dossier

US 7704279

Bi-directional fixating transvertebral body screws, zero-profile horizontal intervertebral miniplates, expansile intervertebral body fusion devices, and posterior motion-calibrating interarticulating joint stapling device for spinal fusion

Current assignee: Individual

Added 9/23/2026, 11:09:29 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US7704279B2

Title: "Bi-directional fixating transvertebral body screws, zero-profile horizontal intervertebral miniplates, expansile intervertebral body fusion devices, and posterior motion-calibrating interarticulating joint stapling device for spinal fusion"

Patent number: US7704279B2 | Application: US11/208,644

Inventors: Mosheh T. Moskowitz; Nathan C. Moskowitz

Assignee: Individual (original assignee: Individual; a 2016-08-03 reassignment record names Moskowitz, Nathan C.)

Key dates:

  • Priority date: 2005-04-12
  • Filing date: 2005-08-23
  • Publication (grant): 2010-04-27
  • Adjusted expiration: 2028-09-04; status listed as "Expired – Fee Related"

Purpose (plain language): The title and prior-art keyword data indicate a family of spinal-fusion implants and instruments. The named devices are: screws that fixate in two directions across vertebral bodies; "zero-profile" horizontal miniplates placed between vertebrae so they do not protrude; expandable (expansile) intervertebral fusion devices; and a posterior stapling device for interarticulating joints that calibrates motion. The abstract-level keyword data emphasizes bone, fusion, a "mechanism," drilling, and materials such as metal, plastic, and wood.

Scope (per supplied excerpt): The excerpt presents bibliographic data, family/priority linkages to numerous later filings, and keyword/classification metadata. It does not include the claims or full description, so no claim scope can be stated.

What the excerpt does not establish:

  • The actual wording or breadth of any claim (claims text is not included).
  • The precise structure, dimensions, materials, or methods of any named device.
  • Whether the "zero-profile," "expansile," or "motion-calibrating" features are claimed versus merely described.
  • The identity of the four concatenated device families as separate inventions or embodiments.
  • Any legal conclusion about validity, enforceability, or infringement.

No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art research was performed, per instructions.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7704279](/patent/US7704279)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:32:53 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7704279. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.