Patent 7627805

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged through Inter Partes Review, Post-Grant Review, or Covered Business Method review at the USPTO. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs.

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7627805. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

tool_code
print(google_search.search(queries=['US patent 7627805 litigation Unified Patents', 'US patent 7627805 litigation Darts-ip', 'US patent 7627805 PACER']))
thought
The user is asking for known litigation involving US patent 7627805.
I need to use the provided search sites, specifically Unified Patents and Darts-ip, and potentially PACER, to find litigation details.
For each case, I need to extract: plaintiff(s), defendant(s), jurisdiction, case number, filing date, and outcome or current status.
I will focus on the exact patent number 7627805 and avoid similar numbers.

From the previous context, I already have some litigation information:

  • US cases filed in Texas Eastern District Court (case 2:25-cv-00388)
  • US cases filed in Florida Southern District Court (case 0:25-cv-62665)
  • "First worldwide family litigation filed" on 2006-06-06, with a link to Darts-ip.

I will use the search results to confirm and elaborate on this information, and to find additional details like plaintiffs, defendants, and filing dates if they are not explicitly mentioned in the previous context. I will prioritize the search results if they contradict the training data.

Let's start by analyzing the Google Patents information first, as it's directly provided in the full patent text.
The "Family has litigation" section on Google Patents provides direct links and some details:

  1. US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court:

    • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
    • Case Number: 2:25-cv-00388
    • Source: District Court (Unified Patents Litigation Data)
    • Status: Critical (from Google Patents listing) - implies active. No explicit plaintiff/defendant/filing date mentioned directly in this snippet, but Unified Patents typically has this.
  2. US case filed in Florida Southern District Court:

    • Jurisdiction: Florida Southern District Court
    • Case Number: 0:25-cv-62665
    • Source: District Court (Unified Patents Litigation Data)
    • Status: (not explicitly listed as Critical, but part of "Family has litigation") - implies active. No explicit plaintiff/defendant/filing date mentioned directly in this snippet.
  3. First worldwide family litigation filed:

I will use the search results to confirm the details and gather missing information like plaintiff(s), defendant(s), and precise filing dates for the cases.
The search queries are good to go.
Let's analyze the search results.

Search result 1: Unified Patents

Search result 2: Darts-ip

  • Shows litigation for patent family 37743944, which includes US7627805.
  • Confirms the two US cases found on Unified Patents:
  • This clarifies the "First worldwide family litigation filed" date from Google Patents. The 2006-06-06 date listed there is indeed the application filing date of the patent, not the litigation filing date. The litigation itself, for these two cases, was filed in 2025.

Search result 3: PACER search for 7627805.

  • "No information found matching your criteria". This could mean my direct PACER query was too specific or that it requires login/more nuanced search to get results, or simply that the google search for PACER does not directly provide the docket information in the snippet itself. However, the Unified Patents and Darts-ip results are quite comprehensive for these specific cases.

Given the comprehensive nature of Unified Patents and Darts-ip results for the two identified US cases, I have sufficient information to answer the user's request.Here is a list of known litigation involving US Patent 7,627,805:

  1. Case: Integral Wireless Technologies LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

    • Plaintiff(s): Integral Wireless Technologies LLC
    • Defendant(s): Amazon.com, Inc.
    • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
    • Case Number: 2:25-cv-00388
    • Filing Date: April 25, 2025
    • Current Status: Active
  2. Case: Integral Wireless Technologies LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc.

Generated 5/25/2026, 6:47:49 PM