Invalidity dossier
US 7513672
Light emitting panel assemblies
Current assignee: Rambus Delaware LLC
Added 9/23/2026, 2:42:21 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US7513672B2
Title: Light emitting panel assemblies
Inventor: Jeffrey R. Parker
Original Assignee: Solid State Opto Ltd (current assignee listed: Rambus Delaware LLC)
Application No.: US12/164,315 | Filed: 2008-06-30 | Granted/Published: 2009-04-07
Priority date (as listed): 1995-06-27; a priority claim from US09/256,275 dated 1999-02-23 is also noted
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2015-06-27
Purpose and plain-language scope (from the supplied excerpt):
The patent concerns light emitting panel assemblies built around light guides — "planar or of plate-like form" — that distribute light from a source coupled into the guide. The excerpt's classification entries and prior-art keywords ("light," "assembly," "panel member," "panel," "light emitting") indicate the subject matter covers: coupling light from a source into the panel (including shaping the guide, e.g., collimating, focussing or diverging surfaces, and housing at least part of the light source in holes or recesses); redirecting light at the guide surface; and coupling light out via prisms, protrusions, indentations, roughened surfaces, or linear/arc-shaped grooves extending over the guide's length or width. Multi-source arrangements (e.g., multi-colour sources) and tapered light guides are also classified, as is a surgical-field illumination application using white LEDs.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7513672](/patent/US7513672)/en
What the excerpt does not establish:
The supplied text is largely bibliographic, classification, and legal-status data; the claims, written description, and drawings are not included. Therefore this overview cannot state the actual claimed scope, the number or wording of claims, specific embodiments, or the precise technical relationships among the classified features. The excerpt also contains no prior-art references or comparative analysis, so no statement is made about novelty or prior art, and per instruction no litigation, ownership-transfer, or validity analysis is offered. Dates, assignees, and status are reproduced as listed and are described in the source itself as assumptions or non-legal conclusions.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:02 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7513672. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.