Invalidity dossier

US 7113129

Blind signal separation using a combination of correlated and uncorrelated antenna elements

Current assignee: InterDigital Technology Corp

Added 9/24/2026, 2:13:56 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,113,129 B2

Title: "Blind signal separation using a combination of correlated and uncorrelated antenna elements"

Patent number / application: US 7,113,129 B2; Application No. US 11/233,300.

Inventor / assignee: Inventor Steven J. Goldberg; original assignee InterDigital Technology Corp. (current assignee listed as InterDigital Technology Corp. — Google notes assignee listings may be inaccurate).

Key dates: Prior art date and priority date 2004-09-23; filing date 2005-09-22; publication date 2006-09-26; publication of US20060066481A1 on 2006-03-30. Anticipated expiration 2025-09-22. Legal status: "Expired - Fee Related" (stated as an assumption, not a legal conclusion).

Purpose: The invention concerns signal processing, specifically separating desired source signals from a mixture of source signals using blind signal separation (BSS). BSS recovers source signals from a composite signal containing a mixture, and is "blind" because it operates with limited information about the signals, their sources, and propagation-channel effects. The excerpt describes a problem with prior approaches (U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,799,170 and 6,931,362): as the number of sources M grows, so must the number of sensors N (N ≥ M), which is impractical for small portable communications devices with limited volume. The stated aim is a communications device with a compact antenna array that receives a mixture of source signals for use by BSS techniques, allowing separation of desired source signals without requiring spatially separated sensors each supplying a single input.

Plain-language scope (from the excerpt): A communications device separates signals from M sources using an antenna array receiving different summations of those signals; a receiver connects to the array, and a blind signal separation processor builds a mixing matrix from those summations and separates desired source signals from it. The excerpt mentions techniques including PCA, ICA, and SVD, and ends mid-sentence: "a compact antenna array may be used instead…" Full claim language is not present in the excerpt, so the precise claimed scope cannot be stated here.

What the excerpt does not establish: The actual claims, dependent-claim limitations, the specific arrangement of correlated versus uncorrelated antenna elements, exact element counts/geometry, and the complete specification are not included. It also does not establish legal status, validity, or enforceability.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7113129/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:40:48 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7113129. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.