Invalidity dossier

US 7035346

Method and apparatus for desensitization of a wireless receiver

Current assignee: Google LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 8:02:00 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 7,035,346 B1

Title: Method and apparatus for desensitization of a wireless receiver

Patent number: US 7,035,346 B1 (application US09/100,569)

Original assignee: Lucent Technologies Inc. Current assignee listed as Google LLC (per the source's own caveat that listed assignees may be inaccurate).

Key dates: Priority/filing date 1998-06-19; publication/grant 2006-04-25; anticipated expiration 2018-06-19. Legal status listed as "Expired – Fee Related."

Inventors: Michael Eugene Burke; Joseph Thaddeus Lipowski; Leonard Edward O'Boyle; Rulon G. Van Dyke; Jack Chi-Chieh Wen.

Purpose: In wireless (CDMA) systems, base stations control mobile transmit power. In some situations it is advantageous to reduce a base station receiver's sensitivity—for example, to make the base station believe a mobile is farther away than it is, or to balance sensitivity between microcell and macrocell base stations during handoff, where conflicting power-control commands could otherwise arise. Prior art used an attenuator or lossy device before the low-noise amplifier; this always incurred insertion loss on the receive path (up to a few dB), potentially degrading overall noise figure.

Plain-language scope: Rather than attenuating the received signal, the invention sets receiver sensitivity by injecting a desensitization signal (such as a noise signal) onto the receive path, raising the noise power level relative to the signal power level and thereby reducing S/N and sensitivity. A desensitization source feeds a desensitization path with an adjustable attenuator setting the desired desensitization level; the path couples into the receiver's receive path. Injection may occur after the main amplifier, avoiding added noise-figure contribution and preserving full sensitivity when desensitization is not desired. Injection may be at RF, IF, or baseband stages, and the desensitization signal may be broadband noise, a continuous wave signal, a modulated signal, or a digital pseudo-random noise sequence.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7035346/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, complete description, or drawings; claim scope, exact embodiment details, and FIG. 1–7b specifics are only partially described. It also does not establish litigation, validity, or ownership-transfer details, which are outside this overview's scope.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:41:39 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7035346. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.