Invalidity dossier

US 6635987

High power white LED lamp structure using unique phosphor application for LED lighting products

Current assignee: Current Lighting Solutions LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 2:16:33 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6635987 B1

Title: High power white LED lamp structure using unique phosphor application for LED lighting products

Patent number / application: US 6635987 B1; Application US09/670,240

Inventors: Robert J. Wojnarowski; Thomas J. Pozda

Original assignee: General Electric Co. Current assignee listed as Current Lighting Solutions LLC (per the supplied source's assignee field).

Key dates: Priority/filing date 2000-09-26; publication (grant) date 2003-10-21; adjusted expiration 2021-05-29; status listed as "Expired – Lifetime."

Purpose (plain language): The patent addresses making white light from LED lamps. Instead of putting phosphor directly on the GaN LED die (which the text says is hard to mass produce and yields varying color and light output because phosphor thickness at die edges and top varies), the invention pre-applies a phosphor layer to a plastic or glass cap, bulb, or lensing structure that is integral to the LED lamp. Emitted light from the LED die excites the phosphor on that lensing structure. The stated advantages include: replacing phosphor-on-die; output comparable to conventional filament bulbs (including halogen); placing the temperature-sensitive phosphor in a more controlled, lower-temperature area of the lamp; mass producibility; longer lamp/battery life and greater breakage resistance; low-cost assembly for high-volume products, particularly hand-held flashlights; a retrofit/upgrade option for flashlight devices; and good light flux area.

Scope (from the supplied text): Claim-level scope is not reproduced in the excerpt. The description covers at least one LED die and at least one lensing structure with a phosphor layer on at least one side, positioned so die-emitted light excites the phosphor. Embodiments include a multi-LED (five-die) angled array and flip-chip/BGA structures (FIGS. 1–9); application is also stated to extend to wire-bonded LEDs, other light-emitting semiconductors, laser diodes, and wide band gap LEDs. The multi-LED lamp is cross-referenced to application Ser. No. 09/607,700.

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the claims' text, the full specification, or figures. It does not establish the accuracy of assignee, legal status, or expiration data (the source itself labels these as assumptions/not legal conclusions), and it does not establish any litigation, ownership history beyond the listed reassignments, validity, or prior-art analysis.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6635987/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:25 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6635987. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.