Invalidity dossier

US 6478679

Memory device, controller and electronic device

Current assignee: Sega Corp

Added 8/27/2026, 1:37:32 AM

IndustryGaming (G)
At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on fileGaming (G)

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Auto-generating section 1 of 7: Litigation summary

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

I've completed the searches I could run (I hit the search-step limit before I could retrieve the full 21-claim text or the verbatim abstract from a primary source). Here is a concise summary, with confidence levels flagged.

US Patent 6,478,679 B1 — Summary

Title: Memory device, controller and electronic device
Patent number: US 6,478,679 B1 (application no. 09/269,973; PCT/JP98/02097)
Assignee (original): Sega Enterprises, Ltd. (Japan)
Current assignee (per Google Patents, flagged as possibly inaccurate): Sega Corp.
Inventors: Atsunori Himoto, Kenji Tosaki, Madoka Nakayama, Miyuki Yasuoka, and Koji Tsuchiya (all of Tokyo, Japan)
Filing date: May 12, 1998 (PCT filing date; § 371 national-stage entry date July 21, 1999; PCT publication WO 99/08231, Feb. 18, 1999)
Priority dates: JP 9-214322 (Aug. 8, 1997); JP 9-235875 (Sep. 1, 1997); JP 10-054814 (Mar. 6, 1998)
Issue date: November 12, 2002
Status: Expired — Fee Related; anticipated expiration May 12, 2018 (per Google Patents)
U.S. Cl. / Int. Cl.: 463/36; Int. Cl. A63F 13/02 (per the Official Gazette listing)
Claims count: 21 claims (per the Official Gazette entry)
Division: US 6,786,826 B2 (Appl. 10/121,856), a division of the 09/269,973 application, claims a related "game playing method" (4 claims).

CAFC 2026 docket search: I found no Federal Circuit (CAFC) docket or litigation tied to this specific patent number in my searches. The only non-patent hits for "6478679" were unrelated items (a PubMed article PMID and a chemical catalog number), which I disregarded per your instruction to interpret the ID literally and not return similar numbers.

Abstract: I could not retrieve the verbatim abstract text from an authoritative source in the searches performed (the Google Patents full text provided to me does not include a formal abstract). Based on the specification, the invention is, in plain terms: a memory device (memory card) that expands the conventional game-memory-card function by adding its own display (LCD) and operation buttons on the case, so the card can display its stored contents by itself, be operated standalone like a small portable game device, run downloaded sub-games, and connect to a game apparatus body, controller, or another memory card.


Independent claims — plain-language overview

Claim 1 (verbatim, from the Official Gazette listing — authoritative):

"A controller including an operation key and transmitting a command signal, comprising: a control unit; and a loading portion, coupled to the control unit, for loading a memory device; wherein the memory device further comprises, a case; a display disposed on one side of the case for displaying information; at least one operation button, for selecting or saving information, to be operated by an operator; a memory circuit disposed in the case for storing information; and at least two connection terminals including a first male connection terminal and a first female connection terminal each disposed on one end of the case for transferring information."

Plain language (Claim 1): A game controller that has a slot for plugging in a memory card; the memory card itself has a display, at least one button for selecting/saving info, a memory circuit, and both male and female connectors so cards can daisy-chain or link directly.

Other independent-claim themes (approximate — flagged for uncertainty): I was not able to retrieve the full text of all 21 claims from a primary source, so the following is based on the Google Patents "Definitions" extraction in the provided full text (an AI-generated summary, not the formal claim text) and should not be treated as verbatim claim language:

  • Memory device claim(s): A memory card with a case, internal memory, connection terminal(s) on one end, a display on one side, and operator-operated buttons — enabling standalone display and control of stored contents (e.g., viewing backup data, erasing, write-protecting).
  • Memory/backup organization claim(s): Backup data and/or a program stored from opposite ends of the address space (program from low address upward; backup data from high address downward) so they don't overwrite each other; and a first program run when the card is standalone vs. a second program run when connected to an external apparatus.
  • Game system claims: Systems where the card is loaded into a controller and (a) shows a different display (sub-screen) than the main monitor, (b) receives data/programs transferred from the game apparatus body, (c) transfers data/programs back to the game apparatus body, or (d) two cards connect directly to each other via male/female connectors.
  • Controller claims: Controllers with a loading portion for such a memory device, optionally adding selection keys and/or save keys, and a version with a window exposing a region (display, memorandum label, buttons, or microphone) of the loaded card.
  • Electronic-device claims: An electronic device (game apparatus) with a loading portion for the card, optionally with selecting means and/or saving means; dependent versions where selection is based on a program's development scene (e.g., selecting a sub-game), and where saving is triggered automatically upon detecting loading of the card or connection of the controller.
  • Optical-communication claim(s) (7th embodiment): A memory card with a light-emitting unit and light-detecting unit for optical data transfer between two cards, where the light-detecting unit can also act as a solar cell to supply power.

Key uncertainties

  1. Full claim text: Only Claim 1 was retrieved verbatim from an authoritative source (Official Gazette). The other independent-claim descriptions above are inferred from Google's "Definitions" extraction and are not verbatim; the exact claim numbering is unverified.
  2. Abstract: Not retrieved verbatim; paraphrase provided from the specification.
  3. Assignee: "Sega Enterprises, Ltd." is authoritative; Google's "Sega Corp" current-assignee listing is explicitly marked by Google as possibly inaccurate.
  4. Litigation: No CAFC 2026 (or other) docket activity was found for this patent; its expired status (as of May 12, 2018) is consistent with the "Expired — Fee Related" notation.

Generated 8/27/2026, 1:38:25 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6478679. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Keep exploring

Other patents in Gaming (G)

See all Gaming (G) patents →