Invalidity dossier

US 6397241

Multiplier cell and method of computing

Current assignee: NXP USA Inc

Added 9/21/2026, 10:20:14 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,397,241 B1

Title: Multiplier cell and method of computing

Patent number: US6397241B1

Application number: US09/215,935

Inventors: Philipp Michael Glaser; Michael J. Torla

Original assignee: Motorola, Inc. Current assignee listed as NXP USA Inc (the source notes listed assignees may be inaccurate).

Key dates: Priority/filing date 1998-12-18; granted/publication date 2002-05-28; anticipated expiration 2018-12-18. Legal status listed as "Expired - Fee Related."

Purpose: The patent relates to public-key cryptography and, more particularly, to a public-key cryptographic integrated circuit. RSA (Rivest-Shamir-Adleman) and ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography) are described as public-key algorithms providing high security for digital data transfers between electronic devices. The source states that RSA and ECC (Fp) modular mathematics can be computed on a hardware multiplier, while ECC (F2M in polynomial-basis) polynomial mathematics can be computed on a different hardware multiplier. The integrated cryptographic circuit is said to provide a hardware architecture that efficiently computes both the RSA and ECC algorithms, with applications including internet commerce, paging, cellular phones, smartcards, and smartcard terminals. Data such as personal health records, financial records, fingerprints, and retina eye prints is encrypted using functions including integer modular multiplications, modular polynomial multiplication, addition, subtraction, and exponentiation.

Plain-language scope: The disclosure describes an integrated cryptographic circuit supporting both RSA and ECC algorithms, pipelined multiplier architectures for parallel computations, and specific multiplier cells. Figure listings include a 1×N multiplier for computing either the RSA or ECC algorithm, and cells used in the C-register of that multiplier for single-cycle and two-cycle multiplication operations. Classifications include G06F7/72 (residue arithmetic), G06F7/728 (Montgomery reduction), G06F7/724 (finite field arithmetic), and G06F7/725 (finite field arithmetic over elliptic curves).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6397241/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is excerpted and omits the detailed description, claims, and prior-art references. It therefore does not establish the specific claimed multiplier-cell structure, claim scope or limitations, the method steps of "computing," or the cited prior art. All statements above are limited to what the excerpt provides.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:48 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6397241. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.