Invalidity dossier
US 6363056
Low overhead continuous monitoring of network performance
Current assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Added 9/23/2026, 11:09:29 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US6363056B1
Title: Low overhead continuous monitoring of network performance
Patent number: US6363056B1
Application number: US09/115,438
Inventors: Mandis Sadr Mohammad Beigi; Raymond Byars Jennings; Dinesh Chandra Verma
Original assignee / current assignee (as listed): International Business Machines Corp (IBM)
Priority date: 1998-07-15
Filing date: 1998-07-15
Publication/grant date: 2002-03-26
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2018-07-15
Purpose. The patent addresses monitoring network performance metrics between access points in a provider or intranet backbone. A network operator typically controls intermediate access points—not traffic sources or destinations—and a large ISP or corporate backbone has many endpoints, so continuous monitoring across all pair-wise access points is uncommon. Traditional heavyweight probes across all access points are described as not viable because of the added network load. The patent seeks low-overhead continuous monitoring enabling bandwidth monitoring, performance monitoring, and fault monitoring.
Plain-language scope. Network probe packets are generated by copying normal outbound packets and modifying them while keeping the destination address intact. Probe packets are generated when a packet count reaches a specified value N—for example, copying every Nth packet, changing the source address to that of the originating access router, changing the protocol number to a reserved value, attaching a UDP header with a reserved pattern, and attaching a UDP payload containing a probe number and local time-stamp. Recipient nodes identify probes by protocol number and UDP header pattern; nodes unaware of the format discard them through normal network mechanisms. A trigger mechanism determines when to generate a probe; a probe generation mechanism builds it from data-packet contents; a probe detection mechanism at the second access point detects it; and an analysis mechanism compares detected probes to generated ones. Delay can be determined using a common clock; bandwidth via counting probes received versus expected.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US6363056](/patent/US6363056)/en
What the excerpt does not establish. It does not provide the full claims, complete specification, cited prior art, prosecution history, or claim-construction findings; it does not verify assignee accuracy, legal status, or expiration. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is included.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:32:53 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6363056. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.