Invalidity dossier

US 6310366

Retrograde well structure for a CMOS imager

Current assignee: Aptina Imaging Corp

Added 9/23/2026, 12:05:10 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,310,366 B1

Title: "Retrograde well structure for a CMOS imager"

Patent number / application: US 6,310,366 B1; Application US09/334,261.

Inventors: Howard E. Rhodes and Mark Durcan.

Assignee: Original assignee Micron Technology Inc.; current assignee listed as Aptina Imaging Corp (a reassignment recorded 2009-08-04).

Key dates: Priority/filing date 1999-06-16; publication/grant 2001-10-30; anticipated expiration 2019-06-16. Legal status: expired – lifetime. The source notes that legal status and assignee listings are assumptions, not legal conclusions.

Purpose / plain-language scope: The patent relates generally to improved semiconductor imaging devices, specifically a silicon imaging device fabricable using a standard CMOS process. The description explains that CMOS imagers are attractive for low-cost imaging because they offer low voltage and low power operation, compatibility with on-chip electronics (control logic, timing, image processing, A/D conversion), random access to image data, and lower fabrication cost using standard CMOS processing. A CMOS imager circuit conventionally includes a focal plane array of pixel cells, each with a photogate, photoconductor, or photodiode accumulating photo-generated charge in the underlying substrate, plus readout circuitry including an output field-effect transistor and a charge-transfer section with a sensing (floating diffusion) node. Active pixel functions described include photon-to-charge conversion, charge accumulation, charge transfer with amplification, node reset, pixel selection, and output/amplification. The photosensitive element is typically a depleted p‑n junction photodiode or a field-induced depletion region beneath a photogate; image lag can be eliminated by fully depleting the photodiode upon readout. Prior-art keywords indexed for this patent include "retrograde well," "imager," and concentration units "atoms per," consistent with the title's subject matter.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6310366/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is an excerpt; the detailed description and all claims are omitted. It does not provide the specific retrograde well structure, dopant concentrations, or claim language; nor does it establish the full specification, drawings, or prosecution history.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:50 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6310366. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.