Invalidity dossier

US 6219706

Access control for networks

Current assignee: Cisco Technology Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 4:50:37 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6219706 B1

Title: Access control for networks

Patent number: US 6219706 B1

Application number: US09/174,200

Inventors: Serene Fan; Steve Truong

Assignee: Cisco Technology, Inc. (original assignee; listed current assignee is Cisco Technology Inc)

Priority/filing date: 1998-10-16 (priority date listed as an assumption, not a legal conclusion)

Publication (grant) date: 2001-04-17

Legal status: Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 2018-10-16

Purpose. The patent relates to network firewalls for controlling external access to a local network, and more particularly to firewalls having dynamic access control lists (ACLs). The stated aim is to protect networks from unauthorized accesses and to provide an access control system and method for controlling traffic to and from a local network, preferably implemented on a dedicated network device such as a router positioned between a local network and an external network, or between local networks.

Plain-language scope. Rather than relying only on static packet filtering, which checks packet headers against fixed ACL criteria, the described approach also inspects packet payload. Access control items are dynamically generated and removed based on the context of an application conversation. Channels through the firewall may be dynamically allocated based on knowledge of the application type and protocol, and packet payloads may be selectively examined to determine when new channels are about to be opened. The text distinguishes handling of SMTP (single channel, well-known port), FTP (well-known control channel plus data channels with arbitrary ports negotiated via the control channel), and H.323 (multiple control and data channels with arbitrary port numbers), noting static filtering handles such multi-channel protocols poorly.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6219706/en

What the excerpt does not establish. It does not provide the full claims, detailed description, or drawings; the full number and exact wording of claims are not shown, though claim-related terms appear in the keyword listing. It does not establish the identity or content of specific prior-art references beyond a citation to "Building Internet Firewalls" and a Check Point firewall implementation. It does not establish litigation, ownership transfers beyond the recorded assignment, validity, or a legal conclusion on status or dates. The excerpt notes some terms were truncated or omitted (e.g., protocol counts and subsequent text).

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:44:06 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6219706. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.