Invalidity dossier
US 5973619
Automated vehicle dispatch and payment honoring system
Current assignee: Paredes Alexis
Added 9/23/2026, 1:31:54 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 5,973,619 A
Title: Automated vehicle dispatch and payment honoring system
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5973619/en
Bibliographic data (from supplied text): Application US08/872,084; filed 1997-06-10; priority date 1997-06-10; granted/publication date 1999-10-26. Inventor: Alexis Paredes. Original assignee listed as "Individual"; current assignee listed as "Paredes Alexis." Legal status listed as "Expired – Lifetime," with anticipated expiration 2017-06-10. Classifications include G07F7/00, G07F7/08, G06Q10/02, G06Q30/02, G07B13/00, G07F17/00, and G08G1/123.
Purpose: The invention is an automated vehicle dispatch and payment honoring system intended to be distributed to serve numerous locations and users. It provides a computerized vehicle stand unit and/or software program that reprocesses a service request, letting a user enter and change selections—transportation company, destination, form of payment, and number of passengers—before a dispatch or service is registered to an authorized company. It is described as extensible to taxis, limousines, private cars, and buses, and to multiple languages, addressing prior systems that were strictly limited to one language.
Plain-language scope: A free-standing or wall-mounted computerized unit guides a customer through menus. Per the described flowchart (FIGS. 1, 1A; steps 100–910): START; select language (200); select a company from authorized taxi companies, with advertisements (300); enter number of passengers (400); select a destination from map categories, with additional information or changed picks (500–600). The system then displays an approximate fare and payment forms honored, prints a receipt, and relays the request to a dispatcher by telecommunication or satellite link. A "Taxilink card" (FIG. 1b) supports direct-bill or debit accounts. The text notes safety benefits and replacement of taxi hard stands. Each unit is stated to operate independently, unaffected by geographical relationship to other units.
What the excerpt does not establish: The excerpt is partial (marked as such), so the full specification, all claims, and the complete flowchart are not available here. It provides no claim language, no prosecution history, no finding on validity or enforceability, and no evidence for the litigation or assignment entries listed in the source header.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:04 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5973619. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.