Invalidity dossier

US 5946030

Apparatus and method for electronic image centering

Current assignee: Texas Instruments Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 11:25:12 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US5946030A

Title: Apparatus and Method for Electronic Image Centering

Patent Number: US5946030A
Application Number: US08/184,794
Inventor: Alan Neal Cooper
Assignee: Texas Instruments Incorporated (original and current, per the source)
Priority/Filing Date: 1994-01-21
Publication (Grant) Date: 1999-08-31
Legal Status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2016-08-31)

Purpose
The invention addresses "bore sight error"—misalignment between the center of an image sensor's image area and the center of the displayed image. The source states that manual physical alignment is difficult and nearly impossible because one pixel is approximately eight microns, making the manual process "slow, tedious, expensive and unsatisfactory." The disclosed apparatus and method provide electronic image centering to "substantially eliminate the disadvantages associated with manual image sensor adjustments."

Plain-Language Scope
The apparatus applies to an image sensor having an image area for receiving light to form image data. A storage area receives lines of image data in response to an image area gate signal; a serial register receives successive lines in response to a storage area gate signal and serially outputs them in response to a serial register gate signal. A timing controller generates these gate signals plus display timing signals, and adjusts timing relationships in response to vertical and horizontal adjust values from an operator input device.

The method centers image data by altering timing relationships: vertical shifting is achieved by changing timing between the image-data transferring step and the displaying step in response to a vertical adjust value; horizontal shifting by modifying timing between serial reading and displaying in response to a horizontal adjust value. Embodiments are described for frame transfer, interline transfer, and line addressable image sensors. This approach uses image sensors with a larger-than-required image area so that centering proceeds by limited vertical and horizontal shifting.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5946030](/patent/US5946030)/en

What the excerpt does not establish
The excerpt is partial (truncated mid-sentence in the frame transfer description). It does not provide full claim text, the complete specification, all figures, or the exact claims defining the scope. Classifications listed include H04N17/002, H04N23/80, H04N23/81, and several H04N25 subclasses. No litigation, ownership transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is offered or should be inferred.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:32:45 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5946030. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.