Invalidity dossier

US 5919551

Variable pitch structured optical film

Current assignee: 3M Innovative Properties Co

Added 9/23/2026, 9:06:00 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,919,551 A

Title: Variable pitch structured optical film

Assignee/Current Assignee (per listing): 3M Innovative Properties Co; also listed as 3M Co. Original assignee: 3M Innovative Properties Co. Inventors: Sanford Cobb, Jr.; Mark E. Gardiner; Keith M. Kotchick; Kazuhiko Toyooka; William A. Hibbard.

Key dates: Priority/filing date 1996-04-12; publication/grant 1999-07-06; anticipated expiration 2016-04-12. Legal status listed as "Expired - Lifetime." A 1996-07-01 assignment to Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company is recorded.

Purpose: Structured optical films are used in optical display systems to control light direction (transmitted/reflected) to increase brightness and reduce glare. Using two such films, with prisms angled (typically about 90°), can increase brightness within a narrowed viewing range but may worsen moire interference and cause optical coupling—uneven transmission appearing as bright spots, streaks, or lines where a plano surface contacts or nearly contacts a structured surface.

Plain-language scope: The invention is a structured optical film whose structured surface has generally parallel peaks separated by valleys, arranged in groups where adjacent-group pitch differs. One aspect: a first group of adjacent peaks with a first peak pitch, and an adjacent second group with a different second peak pitch. Another aspect applies the same group-to-group pitch variation to valleys separated by peaks. A further aspect: peak pitch is substantially constant while valley pitch varies within a group of three or more successive adjacent valleys. Preferred group size is 20 or fewer adjacent peaks/valleys (more preferably 10 or fewer; even more preferably 3 or fewer). Groups may be defined by width—about 0.5 mm or less, more preferably about 200 µm or less. It is also preferable that pitch varies over any three adjacent valleys/peaks. The stated aim is reducing visibility of moire interference patterns.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5919551/en

What the excerpt does not establish: Claims are not fully reproduced; the excerpt also does not provide the complete specification, drawings, examples, or the exact claim language/claim count. It does not establish validity, enforceability, litigation, or ownership transfers beyond the recorded assignment.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:40:57 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5919551. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.