Invalidity dossier

US 5850442

Secure world wide electronic commerce over an open network

Current assignee: Intellectual Ventures II LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 5:39:15 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US5850442A

Title: Secure world wide electronic commerce over an open network

Patent Number: US5850442A

Inventor: Sead Muftic

Original Assignee: Entegrity Solutions Corp (current assignee listed as Intellectual Ventures II LLC)

Application Number: US08/622,015

Priority/Filing Date: 1996-03-26

Publication (Grant) Date: 1998-12-15

Legal Status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2016-03-26)

Purpose and Plain-Language Scope

The patent is directed to the field of communication systems, and more particularly to systems using smart tokens—such as smart cards or PCMCIA cards—together with a public key infrastructure to enable secure electronic transactions over an open network.

The excerpt explains the underlying concepts the invention builds upon. Encryption is used both to ensure privacy (so only the intended recipient can decrypt information) and to ensure authenticity (that a message genuinely originated with its purported source and was not tampered with). In single-key encryption, one shared key both encrypts and decrypts, but the key must be available to both sender and receiver, which is inconvenient and insecure. In public key systems, each participant has a public key and a related private key; material encrypted with the public key can only be decrypted with the private key, and material encrypted with the private key can only be decrypted with the public key. Knowledge of the public key does not help deduce the private key, so the public key can be widely disseminated. Sender authentication and electronic signatures can be achieved by encrypting with the signer's private key, and message digests (analogous to CRC check sums) may be used to avoid encrypting entire large documents.

The classification references indicate the subject matter relates to payment architectures, electronic credentials and certificates, key management, electronic wallets, electronic shopping, and electronic negotiation.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5850442](/patent/US5850442)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is an abbreviated excerpt. It does not include the full claims, the complete written description, detailed embodiments, or the specific figures. It also does not establish the precise claimed scope, the specific smart-token mechanisms, or the exact manner in which the public key infrastructure is integrated. No prior art or validity analysis is presented here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:25 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5850442. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.