Invalidity dossier

US 5819184

Portable communications and data terminal operating to optimize receipt of both incoming CDPD and AMPS messages

Current assignee: Cirrus Logic Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 6:19:02 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,819,184

Title: "Portable communications and data terminal operating to optimize receipt of both incoming CDPD and AMPS messages"

Patent number / application: US 5,819,184 A; Application US 08/496,282, filed 1995-06-28.

Priority / dates: Priority date 1995-06-07 (claimed from US 08/487,043). Filing date 1995-06-28. Granted and published 1998-10-06. Anticipated expiration 2015-06-07. Legal status listed as "Expired – Lifetime."

Inventor / assignee: Inventor Russell P. Cashman. Original assignee Pacific Communication Sciences, Inc. (assignment recorded 1995-11-21). Current assignee listed as Cirrus Logic Inc. (merger recorded 2018-03-19).

Purpose: The invention "relates generally to wireless communication devices" and "more particularly … to switching wireless portable subscriber stations between both data and voice modes." The subscriber station is to receive both incoming CDPD (Cellular Digital Packet Data) and AMPS (Advanced Mobile Phone Service) messages.

Plain-language scope (per the supplied excerpt): The background explains that AMPS is the analog cellular voice system (FCC-assigned 800–900 MHz); digital data over AMPS suffers from narrow channel bandwidth, transmission errors, signal loss, fading and dead spots that limit baud rate. CDPD provides non-intrusive, packet-switched data sharing AMPS transmission facilities and AMPS frequencies, using connectionless network services and multiple-access channel sharing. A Mobile Data Base Station (MDBS 1) links the Mobile End System (M-ES 2) to an MD-IS, intermediate systems, and fixed end systems; cell transfer between adjacent cells is done independently of normal AMPS hand-off. Both AMPS and CDPD functions "can be handled by the same hand-set or end system equipment," and the MDBS is "preferably located with the AMPS base station." Classifications include H04W36/00, H04W76/20, H04W68/00, and H04W88/06 (multi-mode terminals).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5819184/en

Not established by this excerpt: The claims' specific limitations and the described embodiments of the switching/optimization mechanism are not reproduced here; the excerpt omits detailed description text ("consult the source for omitted text"). No information is given on validity, enforceability, or prior-art distinctions beyond cited background.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:51 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5819184. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.