Invalidity dossier

US 5778989

Screw driving tool

Current assignee: Hilti AG

Added 9/21/2026, 10:46:05 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,778,989 A

Title: Screw driving tool
Assignee: Hilti AG (original and current assignee per the listing)
Inventor: Anton Neumaier
Priority date: 1995-07-26 · Filed: 1996-07-26 · Granted/Published: 1998-07-14 · Application no.: US 08/687,873
Status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2016-07-26)
Classification: B25B 23/00, B25B 23/0064 (screwing-depth adjustment), B25B 23/14, B25B 23/141 (mechanical overload release couplings)
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5778989/en

Purpose. The tool is a manually operable, motor-driven screwdriver, particularly for installing surface-flush or countersunk screws. Its stated object is a clutch that is economical to manufacture and features low weight and low wear — addressing drawbacks of the prior-art clutch disclosed in EU-PS 0 195 853, whose large teeth and heavy parts raised tool weight and wear.

Plain-language scope. The housing holds a motor, a motor-driven drive pinion fixed axially in the housing, and a spindle that is axially displaceable against a spring. A clutch element sits between pinion and spindle: per the description, a ball that is radially displaceable in a passageway through the drive pinion extending transversely to the driving direction. An actuation member moves the ball; when engaged, the ball cooperates with at least a stop face on the spindle (described as an axially extending groove) to rotationally lock spindle and pinion. Stops on the spindle displace the actuation member axially. Further described features: a detent element (ball) affixing the actuation member axially to the drive pinion; a retaining element cooperating with the spindle; a spring whose force does not exceed that of the spring acting on the drive pinion; and an unlatching member (O-ring) on the spindle that releases the detent so the clutch disengages automatically when the depth stop contacts the material. Figures 1–4 show the tool and clutch fully disengaged, fully engaged, and just before disengagement.

What the excerpt does not establish. It does not state claim language or claim count, does not identify issued claims versus description, lists no cited prior-art references beyond EU-PS 0 195 853, and does not address validity, enforceability, or ownership changes. The classification and legal-status fields are expressly noted in the source as assumptions, not legal conclusions.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:10 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5778989. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.