Invalidity dossier

US 5741495

Glucan drug delivery system and adjuvant

Current assignee: Alpha Beta Technology Inc

Added 9/21/2026, 1:02:05 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,741,495 A

Title: Glucan drug delivery system and adjuvant

Assignee/Applicant of record: Alpha Beta Technology Inc (original assignee); current assignee listed as Alpha Beta Technology Inc / Biopolymer Engineering Inc. Google notes assignee listings "may be inaccurate."

Key dates: Priority date 1989-06-15; filing date 1997-02-27 (application US08/810,947); granted/publication date 1998-04-21; anticipated expiration 2009-06-15. Legal status: Expired – Fee Related.

Inventors: Spiros Jamas, Gary R. Ostroff, D. Davidson Easson, Jr.

Purpose: The patent describes a pharmaceutical composition that functions simultaneously as a drug delivery vehicle and as an adjuvant. The composition comprises whole glucan particles (whole β-glucan particles — micron-sized hollow spheres with a rigid, semi-permeable glucan matrix that retain the in vivo three-dimensional morphology of yeast cell walls) plus a pharmacologically active substance such as a drug or antigen. The β-glucan acts as an adjuvant by non-specifically enhancing immune response, reportedly via interaction with β-glucan receptors on monocytes, inducing interleukin-1 and other cytokines.

Plain-language scope: A drug or antigen can be contained within (encapsulated/entrapped in the hollow cavity), uniformly dispersed in, or chemically linked to the whole glucan particles. Entrapped drug releases through the glucan matrix into the physiological environment. The vehicle is described as targeting drug or vaccine to macrophages, activating those cells, and extending in vivo half-life by protecting against degradation and rapid clearance. Release rate can be controlled, e.g., by crosslinking or by modifying β-glucan branching/water-holding capacity. Figures 1–7 show protein release rates and antibody titers for BSA and P55 formulations (mixed vs. crosslinked).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5741495/en

What the excerpt does not establish: No claim language, full specification, or examples are included here, so the exact scope of the claims, dosage forms, quantitative release data, efficacy results, and the complete list of drugs/antigens are not shown. The excerpt also does not establish current ownership, enforceability, or validity.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:00:59 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5741495. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.