Invalidity dossier

US 5610745

Method and apparatus for tracking buffer availability

Current assignee: Brocade Communications Systems LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 4:29:28 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US5610745A

Title: Method and apparatus for tracking buffer availability

Patent number / application: US5610745A; Application US08/548,505

Inventor: Dwayne Bennett

Original assignee: Hewlett Packard Co. (later recorded assignee: Brocade Communications Systems LLC, per the source listing)

Key dates: Priority and filing date 1995-10-26; granted and published 1997-03-11; anticipated expiration 2015-10-26; legal status "Expired – Lifetime"

Purpose. The invention relates to methods and apparatus for tracking the availability of a memory buffer within a Fibre Channel network port. In Fibre Channel, a switch provides a fabric of interconnected fabric-ports (F_ports) linking node-ports (N_ports) on attached devices. Class 2 transfers allocate a path through the switch for each single frame, requiring a memory mechanism to temporarily store incoming frames before routing. Receive-buffer allocation on an F_port is typically dictated by the maximum number of frames an N_port may send without an indication that more receive buffers are available; a switch may meanwhile be waiting to forward frames to a busy destination N_port. The patent addresses allowing an N_port to keep sending even when a defined maximum has been reached.

Plain-language scope. Each N_port has a transmit credit counter that is decremented by one per frame transmitted and incremented by one on receipt of a receiver-ready signal; the N_port may transmit only when that counter exceeds zero. Each F_port has receive buffers, a receive credit counter counting frames the N_port may currently transmit for temporary storage while awaiting forwarding, and a smart credit counter counting receive buffers available to receive frames from the N_port.

Not established by the supplied excerpt. The excerpt is partial (it ends mid-sentence) and omits the claims, detailed description, drawings, and any prior-art references; it therefore does not establish the specific claimed scope, embodiments, or dependencies, nor the accuracy of the listed assignees or legal-status assumptions. No prior art, litigation, validity, or ownership-transfer analysis is undertaken here.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5610745](/patent/US5610745)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:44:26 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5610745. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.