Invalidity dossier
US 5606668
System for securing inbound and outbound data packet flow in a computer network
Current assignee: Check Point Software Technologies Ltd
Added 9/21/2026, 10:40:54 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US5606668A
Title: System for securing inbound and outbound data packet flow in a computer network
Patent number / application: US5606668A (application US08/168,041)
Inventor: Gil Shwed
Assignee: Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (original and current assignee listed)
Key dates: Priority/filing date 1993-12-15; granted/publication date 1997-02-25; anticipated expiration 2014-02-25. Legal status shown as "Expired – Lifetime." Related priority filings listed for EP, DE, CA, JP, PCT, and US08/664,839.
Purpose: The patent relates to controlling computer network security, specifically an easily alterable or expandable method for controlling information flow to and from internal and external destinations. It addresses the conflict between connectivity and security by using packet filtering to permit connectivity while controlling traffic and blocking illegal communication attempts.
Plain-language scope: The disclosed method operates a network passing data as packets. It involves: generating definitions of each network aspect controlled by a security rule; defining the security rule in terms of those aspect definitions; converting the rule into a set of filter-language instructions; and providing a packet filter module in at least one network entity. The module emulates a packet filtering module, reads and executes the instructions, and either accepts (passes) or rejects (drops) each packet. A further aspect stores results and uses stored results in the accept/reject decision. Objects include controlling flow from/to internal and external destinations, examining every packet passing a node, and providing a generic packet filter controlled by instructions so an administrator can alter security policy without changing the filter itself or writing extensive code.
Figures (as listed): network topology (FIG. 1); security system applied to topology (FIG. 2); administrator screen (FIG. 3); graphical-information-to-filter-script conversion (FIG. 4); information flow (FIG. 5); packet filter operation (FIG. 6); virtual machine operations (FIG. 7).
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5606668](/patent/US5606668)/en
What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, complete description, all prior-art references, or the detailed operation of figures. It does not establish litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior-art comparisons. Legal status is noted as an assumption, not a legal conclusion.
Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:20 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5606668. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.