Invalidity dossier

US 5568595

Method for generating artificial shadow

Current assignee: Kodak IL Ltd

Added 9/17/2026, 2:31:42 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 5,568,595 A

Title: Method for generating artificial shadow

Patent number: US 5,568,595 A
Application number: US08/538,767
Inventors: Hanan Yosefi; Shimon R. Armoni
Original assignee: Scitex Corp Ltd
Current assignee (as listed): Kodak IL Ltd
Prior art date / priority date: 1993-04-30 (noted as an assumption, not a legal conclusion)
Filing date: 1995-10-05
Publication (grant) date: 1996-10-22
Legal status: Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2013-04-30
Classification: G06T 15/60 (Shadow generation), among related G06T classes

Purpose. The patent addresses an integrated color electronic pre-press system with a customized capability to generate artificial shadowing for images. It notes drawbacks of prior manual approaches—airbrushing by hand and the "TPVN" (two-point vignette) function on Scitex's Imager workstation—both said to require considerable artistic ability and coordination.

Plain-language scope. The disclosure describes methods and apparatus for adding an artificial shadow to an imaged object without receiving a separate image of the shadow. A shadow unprotected area and a shadow protected area are indicated together as a total shadow area; shadow values are computed from a shadow pattern covering the total area but assigned only to the unprotected area. Shadow characteristics may be user-selected (dark point, bright point, brightness curve, protected-area location, combining factor, graininess) and previewed at low resolution. Multiple objects and corresponding shadows may be handled in one scene. A mask image is generated that is transparent to underlying color values within the object area, transparent within the shadow area to the separation(s) in which shadow colors are defined, and opaque to remaining separations. Shadow protected/unprotected areas may be disjoint, comprising multiple regions. The system spans differently formatted image manipulation modes (raster; run length-encoded; layout/format unification control).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5568595/en

Not established by this excerpt: the full claims and their exact wording; the complete specification, drawings, and omitted text; the detailed steps in the Figures 6A–6C flowchart; and whether the listed ownership changes or statuses reflect a legal conclusion (the source expressly disclaims this).

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:06 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5568595. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.