Invalidity dossier

US 5478668

Rechargeable lithium battery construction

Current assignee: Valence Technology Inc

Added 9/20/2026, 5:19:02 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US5478668A

Title: Rechargeable lithium battery construction
Patent number: US5478668A
Application number: US08/241,255
Inventors: Antoni S. Gozdz, Caroline N. Schmutz, Jean-Marie Tarascon, Paul C. Warren
Original assignee: Bell Communications Research, Inc.
Current assignee (as listed): Valence Technology Inc
Priority date: 1993-11-30 (claimed from US08/160,018)
Filing date: 1994-05-11
Publication/grant date: 1995-12-26
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 2013-11-30

Purpose and plain-language scope (based only on the supplied excerpt): The patent concerns the construction of a rechargeable lithium battery. The excerpt's abstract-level indexing terms point to a lithium-ion battery using an electrolyte and an electrolyte solution, a matrix material, a mixture, a fluid, a foil, and a barrier function, with a "penetration" effect noted. The description keywords indicate cells, membranes, layers, a copolymer, plasticizer, and lamination, and the claims reference an electrolyte, an electrolyte solution, a mixture, a matrix material, a fluid, and a "complement" effect. The chemical and material terms indexed in the description include lithium, lithium-ion species, LiClO4, LiPF6, LiBF4, ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, dimethyl carbonate, diethyl carbonate, dibutyl/diethyl/dimethyl phthalate, polyvinylidene fluoride, hexafluoropropylene, polyolefin, aluminum, copper, nickel, graphite, carbon black, and fumed silica. Read narrowly, these signals suggest a laminated, polymer/matrix-based rechargeable lithium (lithium-ion) cell construction with foil current collectors. However, the excerpt does not reproduce any actual claim language, so the precise scope of the claims cannot be stated.

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the granted claims, the written description, or the abstract in full; therefore the exact claimed subject matter, claim scope, and embodiments are not established here. It also does not establish validity, enforceability, litigation history, or current ownership as a legal conclusion. Dates and assignee listings are presented as assumptions per the source, not legal conclusions.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5478668](/patent/US5478668)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:52 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5478668. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.