Invalidity dossier

US 5362420

Low impedance pressure sensitive adhesive composition and biomedical electrodes using same

Current assignee: 3M Co

Added 9/23/2026, 4:43:50 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 5,362,420

Title: Low impedance pressure sensitive adhesive composition and biomedical electrodes using same

Patent Number: US 5,362,420 A

Inventors: Steven K. Itoh, Timothy M. Dietz, Rosa Uy

Original Assignee: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (current assignee listed as 3M Co)

Key Dates:

  • Priority date: 1991-11-15
  • Filing date: 1993-12-21
  • Publication/grant date: 1994-11-08
  • Anticipated expiration: 2011-11-15 (status: Expired – Lifetime)

Purpose:
The invention relates to low impedance, ionically-conductive, hydrophilic pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) compositions and their use in biomedical electrodes. The patent explains that biomedical electrodes typically include a conductor connected to equipment and a conductive medium adhered to mammalian skin. Because such electrodes transmit electrical signals to and from skin, good conductivity with minimal electrical impedance is required during diagnostic, therapeutic, or electrosurgical procedures. Low impedance is especially important for defibrillation electrodes (to help ensure an effective circuit during life-saving measures) and for dispersive electrodes (where higher impedance at one contact area can raise current density elsewhere).

Plain-Language Scope:
The patent concerns water- and humectant-plasticized PSA hydrogels used as the conductive medium in biomedical electrodes. These hydrogels are described as one-phase compositions that are both hypoallergenic pressure-sensitive adhesives and ionically-conductive media. The excerpt describes the hydrogel's dependence on water/moisture content for formation and for conductivity via interaction with an electrolyte, and discusses prior approaches such as the two-phase adhesive of U.S. Pat. No. 4,588,762 (Mruk et al.) and an interpenetrating polymer network composition in European Patent Publication 0 085 327 (Cahalan et al.).

What the Excerpt Does Not Establish:
The supplied text is a partial excerpt. It does not include the full claims, the complete written description, detailed composition ranges, working examples, or the full discussion of prior art. Specific numerical impedance values and formulation details are not shown.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5362420/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:44:15 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5362420. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.