Invalidity dossier

US 5345597

Call set-up in a radio communication system with dynamic channel allocation

Current assignee: Rockstar Bidco LP

Added 9/23/2026, 7:28:56 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US5345597A

Title: Call set-up in a radio communication system with dynamic channel allocation
Patent number: US5345597A
Application number: US08/040,395
Inventors: Leo Strawczynski; Howard M. Sandler; Gregory L. Plett; David G. Steer
Original assignee: Northern Telecom Ltd
Current assignee (per listed data): Rockstar Bidco LP
Priority date: 1990-10-17 | Filing date: 1993-03-30 | Publication/grant date: 1994-09-06
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 2011-09-06
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5345597](/patent/US5345597)/en

Purpose
The invention addresses call set-up in radio systems using dynamic channel allocation (DCA), especially cellular systems, where each cell may potentially use any traffic channel and the channel choice is made dynamically and in a decentralized manner by the base station or subscriber terminal. The stated problem is that a channel may appear free of interference at one end of the link (e.g., the base station) but suffer appreciable interference at the other end (e.g., the subscriber terminal), degrading link quality. Existing approaches, such as U.S. Pat. No. 4,628,152 (Akerberg), rely on channel information from only one end and require radio signalling channels.

Plain-language scope
A base station scans available traffic channels and compiles a list of channels that are useable/low-interference from its perspective, then forwards that list to the subscriber terminal over a signalling channel. The subscriber terminal scans the listed candidates, selects channels that are also low-interference from its perspective, and reports its choices back over a signalling channel. The reported choices include the channel with the lowest interference level and the channel with the second lowest level, in that order; the call proceeds on the lowest-interference channel. The second channel is noted as useful for hand-over, per a co-pending application. Signalling/traffic channels may use time-division duplex ("ping-pong"). The patent also describes a corresponding system for selecting a traffic channel to complete call set-up. Figures cover a system illustration, a frequency plan, base station/subscriber block diagrams, and call set-up flow diagrams.

What the excerpt does not establish
Only the front-matter, classification, definitions, and partial description were supplied. The full claim set, detailed embodiments, complete references, and the co-pending applications (Ser. No. 568,148; the hand-over application) are not reproduced. Nothing here establishes validity, enforceability, litigation history, or the accuracy of listed assignees and legal status.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:01 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5345597. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.