Invalidity dossier

US 5316540

Apparatus and method for separating microscopic units in a substantially continuous density gradient solution

Current assignee: Terumo BCT Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 1:50:54 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,316,540

Title: Apparatus and method for separating microscopic units in a substantially continuous density gradient solution

Patent number: US 5,316,540 A

Application number: US 08/003,559

Inventors: John D. McMannis; Nicholas London

Original assignee: Cobe Laboratories Inc. (current assignee listed as Terumo BCT Inc.)

Key dates: Priority/filing date 1993-01-13; granted and published 1994-05-31. Status listed as expired – lifetime, with anticipated expiration 2013-01-13. A related filing, US 08/180,433 (US 5,368,542 A), shares the 1994-01-12 priority.

Purpose: The invention generally relates to separating microscopic units (e.g., particular types of cells or cell clusters) from a fluid medium by centrifugation in a substantially continuous density gradient solution. Centrifugation is described as relying on constituents assuming a particular radial position within a centrifuge bowl based on their respective densities, thereby separating when rotated at an appropriate angular velocity for an appropriate period.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied text): The described system uses a variable-volume centrifuge, notably the COBE 2991™ Cell Processor (subject of U.S. Pat. No. 3,737,096 to Jones et al., issued Jun. 5, 1973). A flexible diaphragm divides the bowl into upper and lower chambers; a flexible processing bag sits in the upper chamber and holds the medium to be centrifuged. The bag connects to sources and collectors via tubing and a centrally located rotating seal. The lower chamber varies the upper chamber's volume, enabling on-line, sequential harvesting of fractions. The text also notes sterility advantages and mentions pancreatic islet harvesting, infertility, transplantation, and diabetes contexts. Classification is B04B5/04 (radial chamber centrifuges, including flexible receptacles).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5316540/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, a complete description, a claims-by-claims scope, or the full abstract; therefore the precise metes and bounds of the claimed invention cannot be determined from this excerpt. It also does not establish ownership-transfer details, validity, litigation, or prior-art comparisons beyond the references named above.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:47 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5316540. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.