Invalidity dossier

US 5133356

Biomedical electrode having centrally-positioned tab construction

Current assignee: 3M Co

Added 9/23/2026, 5:10:02 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 5,133,356 A

Title: Biomedical electrode having centrally-positioned tab construction

Assignee: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (original assignee); 3M Co listed as current assignee.

Inventors: Kathleen M. Bryan, Steven S. Kantner, Joseph L. Galatowitsch, Terry G. Hargroder, Jerome E. Strand.

Key dates: Priority/filing date April 16, 1991; publication (grant) date July 28, 1992; anticipated expiration April 16, 2011. Legal status listed as expired.

Purpose: The patent addresses flexible, low-profile, skin-adhering biomedical electrodes used in electrocardiography (ECG). Such electrodes must provide an adequate conductive surface, a good conductive interface between subject and instrumentation, and sufficient skin adherence for the evaluation period. The invention aims to provide an inexpensively-made electrode meeting these needs.

Plain-language scope: The electrode has two main parts: (a) a separator construction—a flat sheet with two opposite sides and a perimeter; and (b) a conductor member with a pad portion and a tab portion. The pad portion is coplanar with the separator's second side, and the tab portion has a smaller area than the separator's first side. This arrangement positions the mechanical and electrical connection "centrally" within the electrode's perimeter—meaning the tab does not extend beyond that perimeter. The electrode may also include a field of conductive adhesive contacting the pad portion (optionally also the separator's second side), and means for adhering the conductor member to the separator's first side so the tab is adjacent to, but not directly adhered to, the separator. The conductor member may be a thin flexible polymeric film (e.g., polyester) with a conductive layer such as silver/silver chloride, metal foil/laminate, or conductive-carbon-impregnated non-woven web; some versions are relatively X-ray transparent.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5133356/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The excerpt appears truncated mid-sentence (concerning Engel conductive adhesives). It does not provide the full claim set, the complete written description, prosecution history, or figures, so the precise legal claim scope and any limitations cannot be confirmed from this text alone.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:47 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5133356. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.