Invalidity dossier

US 4965822

Full duplex speakerphone

Current assignee: Asure Software Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 4:55:28 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US4965822A — Full Duplex Speakerphone: Overview

Title: Full duplex speakerphone
Patent number: US4965822A
Application number: US07/335,239
Inventor: Errol R. Williams
Original assignee: VideoTelecom Corp (later recorded as VTEL Corporation; current assignee listed as Asure Software Inc)
Priority/filing date: 1989-04-10
Publication (grant) date: 1990-10-23
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2009-04-10
Classification: H04M9/08, H04M9/082 — two-way loud-speaking telephone systems with echo cancellers

Purpose. The patent relates generally to telecommunications and specifically to methods and apparatus for echo and feedback suppression in full-duplex speakerphone voice communication. The stated objects are: improved echo suppression during intervals of voice communication; avoiding excessive signal-level increases during periods of silence when neither party speaks; and echo suppression at low signal levels that is not apparent to the communicating parties.

Plain-language scope. The described speakerphone is an adaptive FIR (Finite Impulse Response) filter speakerphone. Digitized received and transmitted signals are processed by digital circuits providing adaptive FIR filters and summing junctions, with ADCs and DACs converting between analogue and digital domains, plus variable-gain amplifiers for the received and transmitted signals. Two adaptive FIR filters cancel echo in both directions between the received-signal and transmitted-signal summing junctions. The improvement described is a tracking comb filter interposed between the output of the transmitted-signal summing junction and the telephone line, applied when the characteristics of the received signal meet conditions stated in the description. The text discusses problems with prior voice-switching (simplex) speakerphones, residual echo, and AGC raising gain during silence so that background room noise dominates.

Not established by this excerpt. The excerpt omits the claims, abstract, and much of the description, so the exact claimed scope, claim count, and claim language are not established here. It also does not provide the comb filter's detailed structure, control logic, or the specific received-signal characteristics triggering its use. Numerical ranges, embodiments, and any drawing content are not available in the excerpt. No statements are made here regarding validity, litigation, or prior art beyond the background discussion quoted.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US4965822](/patent/US4965822)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:44:01 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4965822. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.