Invalidity dossier

US 4727881

Biomedical electrode

Current assignee: 3M Co

Added 9/23/2026, 5:39:45 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 4,727,881

Title: Biomedical electrode
Patent number: US 4,727,881 A
Inventor(s): Lawrence W. Craighead; Clarence A. Niven
Original assignee: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (current assignee listed as 3M Co.)
Prior art date: 1983-11-14
Filing date: 1986-05-21
Publication/grant date: 1988-03-01
Application number: US06/865,520
Legal status: Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2005-03-01
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4727881/en

Purpose. The patent concerns disposable biomedical electrodes that connect human skin to an electromedical apparatus such as a high-impedance electromyograph, electrocardiograph, or electrostimulator for pain relief. It also covers an automated method of making such electrodes. The stated aim is to securely anchor a one-piece terminal member without washers or other retaining means mechanically biased against the post, simplifying manufacture without compromising mechanical integrity.

Plain-language scope. The electrode includes: (1) an electrical terminal member with a base (upper and lower major surfaces) and an integral upstanding post whose exposed surface connects directly to a lead wire; (2) a conformable, ionically conductive layer contacting the base's lower surface and extending peripherally beyond it; (3) a retainer sheet with an aperture spaced from its edge, dimensioned to receive and surround the post, extending beyond the base to positionally confine the terminal member between the retainer sheet and the conductive layer; and (4) a medical tape (backing plus pressure-sensitive adhesive) with a corresponding aperture. In a preferred embodiment, an electrically conductive metal or metallized layer sits between the retainer sheet and the base's upper surface and extends beyond the base periphery, improving conduction and reducing electrical noise. The manufacturing method includes cutting apertures in a release liner, laminating medical tape, cutting tape transversely, laminating retainer sheets, cutting holes, inserting terminal members, and laminating conductive layer pieces.

What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text is expressly excerpted; the claim set, dependent claims, full specification, drawing details, and the complete method steps are not fully reproduced. It does not establish litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior-art determinations—these were not researched per the operating rules.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:25 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4727881. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.