Invalidity dossier

US 4718662

Tongue positioning and exercising device

Current assignee: Individual

Added 9/23/2026, 3:05:30 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 4,718,662 — "Tongue Positioning and Exercising Device"

Bibliographic data (as supplied): U.S. Patent No. 4,718,662; application no. US06/813,413; inventor Richard B. North; original and current assignee listed as "Individual"; priority/filing date 1985-12-26; publication (grant) date 1988-01-12; anticipated expiration 2005-12-26; legal status "Expired - Fee Related." Classification: A63B23/03 and A63B23/032 (exercising apparatus for face muscles, for insertion in the mouth); A63B2208/12 (specially adapted for children).

Purpose: The device is a dental appliance worn temporarily between the upper and lower teeth to elevate and exercise the peripheral tongue against the upper alveolar ridge, encouraging proper tongue-musculature function during rest and swallowing. Stated goals include strengthening tongue musculature for speech-sound production and correction of defective speech sounds, improving tongue/lip strength for extended brass and woodwind playing, reducing dental decay by keeping the tongue above the upper teeth during swallowing of food, and correcting tongue-thrust swallowing. The background notes adverse effects of habitual tongue thrusting (dental deformation, malocclusion, relapse after orthodontic treatment) and cites U.S. Pat. No. 3,259,129 as a remedial device delivering an electric charge to the tongue when improperly located.

Plain-language scope (from the abstract and description): A device with an outer frontal marginal area clenched between the teeth; tongue supporting members extending inwardly and upwardly from that margin to position the tongue tip against the upper alveolar ridge. Concavo-convex supporting portions incline approximately 15–35 degrees from horizontal, with a V-shaped open area between inner edges to receive the tongue frenulum, and openings (7, 8) permitting saliva passage. A central portion (9) is of lesser transverse section than the supporting members. A modified form (FIGS. 6–7) adds an upward rim (1A') and downward-projecting projections (10, 11) that cause tongue discomfort (negative stimuli) if the tongue is improperly located below the device.

Not established by this excerpt: The full claim language and exact claim scope; the complete description (marked as excerpted); any prosecution history, prior-art analysis beyond the single cited patent, validity, enforcement, ownership transfers, or litigation. The source excerpt does not show the drawings' details.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4718662/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:51:48 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4718662. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.