Invalidity dossier

US 4323557

Pressure-sensitive adhesive containing iodine

Current assignee: 3M Co

Added 9/23/2026, 5:42:35 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US4323557A — Pressure-Sensitive Adhesive Containing Iodine

Title: Pressure-sensitive adhesive containing iodine
Patent number: US4323557A
Application number: US06/062,362
Inventors: Paul D. Rosso; Michael Y. Moss
Original assignee: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (3M Co listed as current assignee)
Priority/filing date: 1979-07-31
Publication/grant date: 1982-04-06
Legal status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 1999-07-31)

Purpose (plain language): The patent concerns a pressure-sensitive adhesive formulation that incorporates iodine, evidently to give the adhesive antimicrobial or antiseptic properties. The excerpt's indexing points to a mixture, an antimicrobial effect, and an "acidificating" effect as recurring concepts, and lists iodine, iodide ion, hydrogen iodide, polyvinylpyrrolidone (povidone-iodine), and N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone among associated materials.

Scope indicators from the excerpt: The extracted text references 20 claim-related occurrences of "pressure-sensitive adhesive," plus claims mention of mixture, substance, method, iodine, anti-microbial effect, and acidificating effect. Description-level terms include dermatologically acceptable, solvent, adhesive, antimicrobial, hydrogen iodide, iodide ion, sodium iodide, potassium iodide, and skin irritation. Exemplary materials named in the description include isooctyl acrylate (6-methylheptyl prop-2-enoate), n-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone, ethanol, ethyl acetate, toluene-4-sulfonic acid, agar, and polyethylene. Test organisms named include Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, Candida albicans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, suggesting antimicrobial assay data (agar assay) appears in the specification. These are indexing/term counts, not verbatim claim language.

What the excerpt does not establish: The full text of the claims; claim dependencies or exact numerical ranges; iodine concentration limits; the precise composition of any example; whether antimicrobial efficacy is quantified; and any comparative results. The excerpt is explicitly marked as partial. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art conclusions are drawn here.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US4323557](/patent/US4323557)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:22 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4323557. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.