Invalidity dossier

US 4204453

Device for automatic tonal accompaniment in electronic musical instruments

Current assignee: US Philips Corp

Added 9/23/2026, 3:28:49 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US4204453A — Patent Overview

Title: Device for automatic tonal accompaniment in electronic musical instruments

Patent number: US4204453A
Application number: US05/862,006
Inventor: Ulrich Gross
Original/current assignee: US Philips Corp
Priority date: 1976-12-29
Filing date: 1977-12-19
Publication (grant) date: 1980-05-27
Legal status as listed: Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 1997-12-19
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US4204453](/patent/US4204453)/en

Purpose

The invention relates to a device for automatic tonal accompaniment in electronic musical instruments equipped with a rhythm unit, wherein "the fundamental, the quint or another tone related to specific chords [is] held and/or the chord itself becoming available in a predetermined sequence in the selected rhythm." The text identifies German Patent Application No. 2,056,509 (laid open for public inspection) as a known device that selects the highest and lowest tones from held chords and reproduces these alternately with the chords.

Plain-language scope

For at least one tonal key, a chord sensor identifies the character of a held chord (e.g., major, minor, seventh) and outputs a signal when a chord is present. A switching device added to the chord sensor switches it to identification of individual tones in the absence of a chord. In the described arrangement, each chord sensor's output goes both to a first input of one of twelve switches (together forming the switching device) and to an OR-circuit input; the switches' second inputs receive a key signal of a preselected tone (e.g., the fundamental). The OR-circuit output drives all switch control inputs; switch outputs feed a priority circuit, whose outputs control further switches gating tone signals and rhythm-unit control pulses, combined via an OR-circuit (resistors R1–R12). The excerpt also describes 12-bit cyclic shift registers, HF clock generator pulses, counters/decoders, a comparator, and chord memory for detecting tones and identifying chords.

What the excerpt does not establish

The excerpt is partial and omits claim language, the full description, drawing contents, and most reference citations. It does not establish claim scope, validity, litigation, ownership transfers, or prior-art effect; no such analysis is provided here. Classifications listed (e.g., G10H1/383, Y10S84/22) are as reported by the source.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:51:33 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4204453. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.