Invalidity dossier

US 4087101

Industrial vehicle frame with internal, structurally reinforcing fuel and hydraulic fluid tanks

Current assignee: TCM Corp

Added 8/27/2026, 9:52:00 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on fileIndustrial Manufacturing (IM)

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Auto-generating section 1 of 7: Litigation summary

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Search Results

USPTO/patent databases: The patent is confirmed as US 4,087,101 A ("US4087101A"). No similar-number confusion was found — the only references returned (Google Patents, FreePatentsOnline, Justia, and a Baidu Scholar record) all point to the same patent.

CAFC 2026 docket search: I ran multiple searches for "4087101" combined with "CAFC," "docket," "litigation," "appeal," and "2026." No results were returned. This is consistent with the patent's status: it expired (lifetime) on May 2, 1995, long before 2026, so there is no plausible pending CAFC appeal involving it. I found no evidence of any CAFC proceeding concerning this patent.


Summary of US Patent 4,087,101

Field Detail
Title Industrial vehicle frame with internal, structurally reinforcing fuel and hydraulic fluid tanks
Patent number US 4,087,101 A (application serial no. 05/736,016)
Inventors Akio Shimazaki; Osamu Kambe
Original assignee Toyo Umpanki Co., Ltd. (Japan)
Current assignee (per Google Patents) TCM Corp. — note: Google labels this listing as "may be inaccurate"; the record itself is not authoritative on post-issuance assignments
Priority date January 12, 1976 (Japanese utility model application JP1976002375U / JA51-2375[U])
Filing date October 27, 1976
Issue date May 2, 1978
Status Expired — Lifetime (anticipated expiration May 2, 1995)
Foreign counterparts CA 1,046,555 A; DE 2,649,885 C2; FR 2,337,653 A1; GB 1,566,300 A; JP S56-14102 Y2

Abstract (verbatim):

"A frame assembly for a tractor shovel or the like includes a front frame and a rear frame having generally U-shaped cross-sections. The frames are pivotally joined by a vertical shaft. A rectangular parallelopiped hydraulic fluid tank is internally mounted in the front frame, and its side and front edges are secured by welding or the like to the front frame plates. Similarly, a rectangular parallelopiped fuel tank is internally mounted in the rear frame, and its side and rear edges are welded or the like to the rear frame plates. The arrangement offers increased frame strength and rigidity with no increase in weight, and the tanks are better protected by reason of their internal mountings."

Technology in brief: In prior-art tractor shovels, the fuel tank and hydraulic-fluid tank were bolted externally to the frame side plates, contributing nothing to frame rigidity (so frames had to be made thicker/heavier) and requiring separate installation work. The invention instead mounts box-shaped (rectangular parallelepiped) tanks inside the U-shaped front and rear frame halves of an articulated vehicle, welding/bolting the tanks' edges to the frame plates so the tanks function as structural members with a section modulus greater than an individual cross-member.


Plain-Language Overview of the Independent Claims

The patent has 5 claims; claims 1 and 4 are the independent claims (claims 2 and 3 depend from claim 1). Note: the Google Patents text provided to me shows claims 1–4 but lists a total of 5 claims; claim 5's text was not included in the available extraction, so I cannot summarize it with confidence.

Claim 1 — An articulated industrial vehicle (e.g., tractor shovel) with a front frame and rear frame pivotally joined by a vertical shaft through bearing members, wherein:

  • Both frames have generally U-shaped cross-sections;
  • The front frame has two opposed side plates plus a front plate;
  • A rectangular (box-shaped) fuel tank is mounted inside the rear frame, spanning across it, and is securely fastened to it;
  • A rectangular (box-shaped) hydraulic-fluid tank is mounted inside the front frame, spanning across it;
  • The hydraulic tank's side edges and upper front edge are rigidly secured to the front frame's side plates and front plate, respectively;
  • As a result, the tanks structurally reinforce and increase the rigidity of their frames.

In plain language: Claim 1 covers the core concept — instead of hanging the tanks on the outside, mount box-like fuel and hydraulic tanks inside the two U-shaped frame halves of an articulated vehicle and weld/bolt them to the frame plates so they act as load-bearing structural reinforcements.

Claim 4 — An articulated industrial vehicle with U-shaped front and rear frames pivotally joined by a vertical shaft, wherein:

  • The rear frame has two opposed side plates plus a rear plate;
  • A box-shaped fuel tank is mounted inside the rear frame, spanning across it;
  • The fuel tank's side edges and upper rear edge are rigidly secured to the rear frame's side plates and rear plate, respectively;
  • A box-shaped hydraulic-fluid tank is mounted inside the front frame, spanning across it, and is securely fastened to it;
  • As a result, the tanks structurally reinforce and increase the rigidity of their frames.

In plain language: Claim 4 is the mirror-image counterpart of claim 1, emphasizing the fuel-tank side of the arrangement — the fuel tank in the rear frame is welded along its side and rear edges to the rear frame's plates, with the hydraulic tank similarly mounted inside the front frame, again using both tanks as structural stiffeners.


Uncertainty Notes

  1. CAFC 2026: No docket entries found; the patent expired in 1995, so a 2026 CAFC appeal is highly unlikely, but I cannot absolutely rule out a legacy damages/royalty dispute that wasn't indexed under the patent number in my searches.
  2. Assignee: "Toyo Umpanki Co., Ltd." is confirmed as the original assignee. Google's "TCM Corp" current-assignee entry is flagged by Google itself as potentially inaccurate and was not independently verified against USPTO assignment records.
  3. Claim 5 was not present in the supplied patent text, so it is omitted here.

Generated 8/27/2026, 9:52:24 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4087101. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Keep exploring

Other patents in Industrial Manufacturing (IM)

See all Industrial Manufacturing (IM) patents →