Invalidity dossier

US 3841312

Electrode arrangement

Current assignee: CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT INC US

Added 9/23/2026, 5:49:16 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 3,841,312

Title: Electrode arrangement

Patent number: US 3,841,312 A (application US00346154A)

Assignee: Consolidated Medical Equipment Inc (original assignee; current assignee listed as CONSOLIDATED MEDICAL EQUIPMENT INC US)

Inventor: E. Corasanti

Dates: Priority/filing date 1973-03-29; publication/grant 1974-10-15; anticipated expiration 1991-10-15. Foreign priority filings listed for SE (7404251), FR (7411462) and DE (2415414), all 1974-03-29.

Legal status: Expired – Lifetime.

Purpose: The arrangement provides reliable electrical contact to the skin of a person or animal, permitting electroencephalogram (EEG) or electrocardiogram (ECG) readings via a connected EEG/ECG system.

Plain-language scope: The arrangement uses an elongated post (stud) and an apertured ring having multiple tabs that mechanically grip the post. The abstract also describes a combined electrode arrangement and adhesive pad assembly, in which a pair of electrically conductive irregularly shaped gel pads are located on opposite sides of the post flange, creating a short electrical contact path between the skin being monitored and the electrode post.

As described in the specification excerpt, a single, solid, unitary stud has a flat flange and a solid elongated extension member with a door-knob shaped portion for electrical contact to the EEG/ECG connector. The apertured metal ring's tabs are angularly displaced from the ring plane to give a spring-loaded connection; flat-edged contact portions "dig in and securely grip the stud." Gel pad, adhesive pad, and ring assembly steps are described in connection with FIGS. 6–9. The stated objective is an improved electrode arrangement, motivated by stated disadvantages of a prior two-piece post-and-stud arrangement (e.g., trapped dielectric material, difficulty silverplating a hollow stud).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3841312/en

What the excerpt does not establish: Full claim text, complete description, drawing contents, and any prosecution history. The excerpt is expressly partial ("consult the source for omitted text"), so claim scope cannot be verified. Litigation, ownership transfers, validity, and prior-art analysis are outside this overview.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:16 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 3841312. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.