Invalidity dossier

US 3416730

Apparatus for providing multiple liquid jets

Current assignee: Individual

Added 9/17/2026, 1:11:01 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 3,416,730

Title: Apparatus for Providing Multiple Liquid Jets
Inventor: Charles C. Perry
Assignee: None stated — listed as "Individual" (original assignee also Individual)
Application No.: US 664,554, filed Aug. 30, 1967, Ser. No. 664,554
Publication/Grant Date: Dec. 17, 1968
Priority Date: June 5, 1963 (claimed from US 285,764, which issued as Patent No. 3,368,760, dated Feb. 13, 1968; the 1967 application is a division)
Legal Status: Expired — Lifetime (anticipated expiration Dec. 17, 1985)

Purpose (from the "Definitions" section): To supply a multiple-component liquid jet — two or more liquids — where a "jet" is an unsupported free stream of liquid in space that is very long relative to the diameter of the orifice from which it issues. The excerpt lists possible purposes: transporting one or more liquids by disposing them within or on the surface of a transporting liquid; maintaining jet integrity or unity by coating it with a second liquid (e.g., high viscosity and/or surface tension); protecting the jet from atmosphere contact; and conducting two highly reactive liquids to a reaction site with a barrier liquid between them.

Plain-language scope: A plurality of substantially concentric nozzles are connected to passages supplying different liquids. The apparatus directs jets of different liquids in parallel relation so they contact one another while traveling at the same velocity, so that there is no mixing and no momentum transfer at the initial area of contact, maintaining a finite area of demarcation. Indicating mechanisms (meters) in the passages indicate a liquid parameter indicative of velocities, with valves regulating flow so issuing jets travel at equal velocity on initial contact. Figures 1–5 show nozzle forms (including a diaphragm/nozzle arrangement forming an annular discharge opening and a three-liquid barrier form); Figures 6–8 show control systems. "Liquid" is defined broadly to include emulsions, dispersions, resins, colloids, suspensions, and composite liquids.

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides no claims text, no complete specification, no prior-art discussion, and no full description of Figures 6–8; it therefore cannot establish the exact metered parameter, specific claim scope, or embodiments beyond those described.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3416730/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:16 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 3416730. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.