Invalidity dossier

US 3384155

Added 9/23/2026, 5:08:42 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 3,384,155

Title: Air conditioning system

Assignee: Borg Warner Corp (original and current assignee as listed)

Inventor: Alwin B. Newton

Key dates: Priority/filing — 1966-01-24; granted/publication — 1968-05-21; anticipated expiration — 1985-05-21 (status: expired).

Purpose and plain-language scope:
The patent addresses a multi-room air conditioning installation in which a single main water supply-and-return conduit (constituting a "single pipe system") interconnects a water chiller, a heater/boiler, and multiple room units via supply and return risers. Unlike a conventional two-pipe system—limited to circulating either hot or cold water to all units at once, making accurate control impossible under intermediate conditions—this arrangement permits heating in some rooms and cooling in others. Hot and cold water are circulated alternately through the single line; the cycling time (ratio of cold-water to hot-water circulation) is varied according to overall cooling and heating needs, and cycling occurs often enough to maintain good temperature control in all zones. Each room unit withdraws water from the supply line only when the circulating temperature matches its thermostatic demand (hot for heating, cold for cooling); otherwise it bypasses. The disclosed control (FIGURE 4) uses switches responsive to room temperature and water temperature, with a solenoid valve opening only when the corresponding contacts align. A modified form (FIGURE 5) varies fan speed via a solid-state motor speed controller signaled by two thermistors in thermal relation with the conduit.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3384155/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is excerpted and does not establish the full claims, the complete specification, the exact operation of all figures (e.g., FIGURES 6–8 are only captioned), the identity or content of any prior-art references, or any legal conclusions regarding validity, enforceability, or ownership transfers.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:48 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 3384155. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.