Invalidity dossier

US 2689346

Long range navigation system

Current assignee: United States Department of the Navy

Added 9/23/2026, 1:33:05 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 2,689,346

Title: Long range navigation system

Patent number: US 2,689,346 A

Inventors: John A. Pierce, Donald E. Kerr, Jabez C. Street

Original assignee / current assignee (as listed): US Department of Navy

Application number: US599163A

Filing date / prior art date: 1945-06-13

Publication (grant) date: 1954-09-14

Legal status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 1971-09-14

Classification: G01S1/24 — path-difference systems in which synchronised signals are pulses, with transit times compared by measuring arrival-time differences (e.g., LORAN systems)

Purpose (from the supplied text): The invention "relates to a position indicating system and particularly to a radio pulse type indicating system wherein a plurality of transmitting stations at known points radiate known time related pulse signals, which are detected at a receiver and timed with respect to each other, so as to indicate the difference in their propagation times, whereby the position of the receiver may be determined."

Plain-language scope (from the supplied text): Pairs of radio pulse transmitters emit time-related pulses, each pair at a recurrence rate distinct from the other pairs (starting at, e.g., 25 pulses per second and increasing in cycle steps). Within a pair, one station is the "master" and the other the "slave"; the slave monitors the time relation and corrects deviation. Pulses are emitted alternately so the first emitted is first received, letting the receiver determine which side of the mid-way center line OO' it lies on, since arrival-time difference is greater or less than the emission interval accordingly. The receiver detects, amplifies, and displays pulses on two horizontal cathode-ray-tube sweeps driven by a counter and slow sweep generator from a 100 kc crystal oscillator; the counter output is twice the pulse recurrence rate. Position is fixed by intersecting spherical hyperbolas (constant distance difference to each station pair), with earth-oblateness corrections for global navigation.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US2689346/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not establish claim scope or wording, the full specification, the number or exact content of claims, the complete drawing descriptions, or the omitted text (e.g., detailed circuit descriptions of Figs. 3–11). The listing notes the assignee information and legal-status data are not legal conclusions, and the excerpt provides no litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art findings.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:03 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 2689346. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.