Invalidity dossier

US 2482522

Voltage regulating system

Current assignee: Westinghouse Electric Corp

Added 9/21/2026, 10:22:23 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 2,482,522 — "Voltage Regulating System"

Bibliographic data (per supplied source): Inventor Lester G. Tubbs; original assignee Westinghouse Electric Corporation; application Serial No. 667,755, filed May 7, 1946; granted and published September 20, 1949; anticipated expiration September 20, 1966; status listed as "Expired – Lifetime." Classification G05F3/06 (regulating AC voltage using combinations of saturated and unsaturated inductive devices, e.g., combined with a resonant circuit).

Purpose: The invention addresses static voltage regulators feeding inductive loads. Prior approaches used either a series capacitor to compensate regulator voltage drop from inductive load, or a tuned reactor-capacitor series network in the output circuit to correct frequency-induced error. The stated problem was that the size/cost of such compensating elements was uneconomical, and simultaneous compensation for both frequency error and inductive-load drop was not achievable. The stated object is a stabilizing network that economically compensates for both simultaneously.

Plain-language scope: A transformer (described as a small step-up autotransformer) has its primary winding connected in series between the static regulator and the load. A reactor and capacitor in series are supplied by the transformer's secondary. Because the reactor and capacitor are in series, their voltage drops oppose, so the transformer need only supply the difference between those drops, keeping it small. The capacitor is dimensioned so that at normal system frequency its reactance exceeds what is needed to cooperate with the reactor's inductive reactance for frequency compensation; the excess capacity reactance also compensates the regulator's inductive reactance caused by the inductive load. The network is said to suit low-voltage output circuits near 120 volts.

Claims: Claim 1 covers the transformer-plus-series-reactor-capacitor combination as described. Claim 2 recites an autotransformer with primary in series between regulator and load and the reactor-capacitor series combination across its secondary.

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not identify the specific commercial regulator or its manufacturer, provide component values, test data, or drawings details. It gives no litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis, and no information beyond the single figure and the text quoted above.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US2482522/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:42 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 2482522. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.