Invalidity dossier
US 191088
Added 9/23/2026, 10:50:47 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 191,088
Title: Improvement in Skylight Lifter and Lock
Patentee: John F. Wollensak, of Chicago, Cook County, Illinois
Dates: Application filed April 23, 1877; patent granted and published May 22, 1877. The source lists the term as expired, with an anticipated expiration date of May 22, 1894.
Assignee: None stated in the supplied text.
Purpose: To provide the public an improved means for conveniently raising, lowering, and locking skylights and other horizontal or inclined windows and doors (source, "Definitions" and Description).
Plain-language scope: The device uses a fixed vertical guide-bar (B), preferably metal and dovetailed, on which a block (O) slides freely. A spring lock-bolt (g) attached to the block engages holes in the bar, locking the sash open, closed, or at intermediate positions. One or more rods (h h) articulate the block to the hinged top sash (a). A grooved pulley (d) in a bracket (e) at the top of the bar guides a cord (f) attached at both ends to the block and passing through an eye in the bolt. Pulling the cord backward disengages the bolt; continued downward pulling raises or lowers the sash, which then locks automatically by spring force. The bight may hang at m n, or two independent cords may be used. The skylight cannot be opened from above but can be operated from any floor below. Only a slender cord is needed beneath the dome. Where the sash is heavy enough, the lower cord attachment to the block may be omitted, letting gravity lower it. Three claims cover: (1) the sliding block with spring bolt combined with guide-bar, rod(s), and operating cord(s); (2) the cord with spring bolt and sliding block, such that pulling backward disengages the bolt and continued pulling raises the sash; (3) the pulley with the guide-bar, cord, and block (cord passing down through the bolt).
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US191088](/patent/US191088)/en
What the excerpt does not establish: It does not establish any assignee, ownership transfer, litigation, license, or validity determination. The source's "Cited By," "Similar Documents," "Classifications," and "Family" listings are bibliographic only; the excerpt contains no analysis of those references and no legal conclusion about the patent's coverage or enforceability.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:06 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 191088. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.