Invalidity dossier

US 133475

Improvement in carriages

Added 9/23/2026, 7:18:43 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview

Title: Improvement in Carriages
Patent No.: US 133,475
Inventor: William Ottmann, of the city, county, and State of New York, N.Y.
Publication/Grant Date: November 26, 1872
Specification Signed: November 9, 1872
Witnesses: W. Hauff; E. F. Kastenhubar (spelling as given)
Legal Status (per source): Expired – Lifetime

Purpose: The invention lets a carriage or buggy be converted between an open and a closed configuration — closed for foul or cold weather, open for fair and warm weather — by attaching or removing a detachable front.

Plain-language scope: With the body (A), back seat (B), and bow-supported top (C, bows D D) of an ordinary carriage, the inventor combines a front (E) that attaches via three screws (a, b, c) — one through a cross-bar (d), two through flanges (e) — and is steadied at its upper part by braces (f) fixed with thumb-screws (g). The front has windows (h), rein holes (i), and side doors (j). A top (F) secured to the front's upper part is buttoned to one of the bows (D) so it can be readily detached when the front is removed. Detaching the front requires only removing the screws and braces and unbuttoning the top.

Claim (as printed): A detachable front provided with flanges to be secured to the bottom of a carriage-body, with braces to steady its top, and with a cover which is buttoned to one of the bows of a carriage-body, the whole being constructed substantially in the manner herein shown and described.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US133475](/patent/US133475)/en

What the supplied excerpt does not establish: It does not state an assignee, the application or filing number, the priority date, or any litigation, ownership transfer, or validity determination. The cited-by entry (US20080105644A1, "Tamper-Evident Closure," 2008) and the "similar documents" list are database artifacts in the excerpt and are not described therein as prior art against this patent.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:10 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 133475. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.