- Filed
- Oct 20, 2026
- Last modified
- Oct 20, 2026
- Petitioner
- Zydus Lifesciences Global FZE et al.
- Inventor
- Karina Kulangara et al
Invalidity dossier
US 12529702
Scoring methods for anti-PD therapy eligibility and compositions for performing same
Current assignee: Agilent Technologies Inc
Added 10/21/2026, 12:00:12 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
US 12529702 B2 – Patent Overview
Title: Scoring methods for anti-PD therapy eligibility and compositions for performing same
Patent number: US 12529702 B2 (application US18/098,198; pre-grant publication US20230152326A1)
Assignees (per the source): Agilent Technologies Inc and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Key dates (per the source): Priority date 2016-04-01; filed 2023-01-18; granted and published 2026-01-20; status active with adjusted expiration 2038-02-05.
Inventors: Karina Kulangara, Nancy Zhang, David Stanforth, Greg Angelides, Stephanie Waldroup, Kenneth Emancipator.
Purpose: The patent concerns deciding whether a patient with a malignancy is eligible for treatment with an anti-PD therapeutic agent (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy) based on a Combined Positive Score (CPS) calculated from the patient's tumor tissue sample.
Plain-language scope: Per the source, the method involves counting, in a tumor tissue sample from a subject with a malignancy: viable PD-L1 positive tumor cells, viable PD-L1 negative tumor cells, and viable PD-L1 positive mononuclear inflammatory cells (MIC). Those counts are then used to calculate a CPS. The excerpt references figures illustrating control-sample evaluation rules, staining intensities on tumor cells, PD-L1 positive inflammatory cells, membrane/cytoplasmic staining, and artifacts (edge staining, cytoplasmic blush, necrotic tissue), plus worked CPS examples for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and gastric carcinoma. The specification defines terms including PD-L1, tumor tissue sample, FFPE/resin-embedded/frozen tissue sections, and staining. The source also lists PD-L1's role in immune evasion and its expression across many solid tumor types.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US12529702/en
What the excerpt does not establish:
- The exact CPS formula (the text is truncated at "the formula:").
- The full text of the claims, including claim scope and dependency.
- Specific eligibility thresholds for anti-PD therapy.
- Details of the "compositions" referenced in the title.
- Any clinical validation data or regulatory status.
No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is offered.
Generated 10/21/2026, 12:00:47 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 12529702. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.