Obviousness

As a technical patent analyst, I must first clarify that the provided patent text for US12271636, sourced from Google Patents, does not include a specific "Prior Art" section that lists particular patent documents or publications to be analyzed for obviousness. The "Prior art keywords" (data, node, compute, memory, compute node) and the "Prior art date" (2019-02-06, which is the patent's priority date) are descriptive of the subject matter but do not provide specific prior art references (e.g., other patent numbers or academic papers) for combination.

Without a list of specific prior art references to cite and combine, I cannot perform a detailed obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103 by identifying combinations of such references and explaining the motivation for a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) to combine them. A proper obviousness analysis requires explicit prior art documents that disclose specific elements or features, which are then combined to render a claim obvious.

Therefore, based solely on the provided patent text, I am unable to identify specific combinations of prior art references to establish an obviousness argument against the claims of US patent 12271636.

Previously Generated Sections Note: The previously generated sections focused on PTAB challenges (specifically IPR2026-00360), which relate to the process of challenging patentability, but do not provide the substantive technical content (i.e., specific prior art documents) necessary to perform an obviousness analysis here. The IPR is still in the pre-institution phase, and the specific claims challenged and prior art asserted are not yet publicly detailed. This means that the specific prior art used in the IPR is not available for this analysis either.

As a technical patent analyst, I must reiterate that a detailed obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103, which requires identifying combinations of specific prior art references and explaining the motivation for a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) to combine them, cannot be performed based on the provided information.

The patent text for US12271636, as provided, includes "Prior art keywords" and a "Prior art date" (which is the patent's priority date), but it does not list any specific prior art documents (e.g., other patents, scientific publications) that I can analyze and combine.

Therefore, without specific prior art references, I cannot perform the requested obviousness analysis.