- Filed
- Nov 20, 2024
- Last modified
- Mar 31, 2026
- Petitioner
- Luxottica of America Inc. et al.
- Patent owner
- E-Vision Smart Optics, Inc.
- Outcome
- Request For Adverse Judgment After Institution
Patent 11487138
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
Current assignee: E-Vision Smart Optics, Inc.
1 claims invalidated
Defender signal. A prior IPR has found at least some claims unpatentable. Those final written decisions are public record and can ground a new IPR strategy or a § 102 / § 103 motion in district court. The LLM analysis below breaks down claim-level outcomes.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.