Invalidity dossier

US 11353143

Added 11/11/2026, 4:00:08 AM

At a glanceActive PTAB challengeNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US11353143B2

Title: Enlargeable flexible hose
Assignee/Original Assignee: Fitt SpA (FITT S.P.A.)
Inventors: Alessandro Mezzalira, Valentino Vigolo, Luca Battaglia, Andrea Petronilli, Marco Bucci, Alessandro Cegalin
Application: US17/151,145, filed 2021-01-16 (published as US20210140568A1 on 2021-05-13)
Publication/Grant: US11353143B2, 2022-06-07
Priority date: 2016-04-29; anticipated expiration listed as 2036-04-29
Classification: F16L11/04, F16L11/08, F16L11/12
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US11353143](/patent/US11353143)/en

Purpose and field. The hose relates to flexible irrigation or garden hoses for transporting water. It is "enlargeable," meaning it automatically enlarges under fluid pressure and automatically retracts when liquid pressure stops. The stated object is to overcome drawbacks of prior hoses (e.g., fire-hose constructions with an outer textile jacket and inner rubber tube) by providing a hose that is efficient, relatively cheap, quick to manufacture, manufacturable automatically in line, wieldy, easy to store, repairable, and customizable in length.

Plain-language scope. Per the description, the hose has a non-corrugated, non-coiled tubular structure and may include an inner layer of a first polymeric elastic material, an outer layer of a second polymeric elastic material, and at least one textile reinforcement layer between them. The inner and outer layers may be joined where the inner surface is not covered by reinforcement yarns (i.e., except where the yarns lie). Materials may be elastomers or thermoplastic elastomers (e.g., TPE-S such as PP/SEBS or PP/EPDM, TPE-O such as ethylene-octene copolymer, natural rubber, latex). The tubular member may have a Shore A hardness of 30–50 ShA (ASTM D2240). Yarns may be polyester, nylon 6,6, polyvinyl alcohol, para- or meta-aramid, or Rayon®, with elongation at break under 30% (preferably under 25%) and toughness of at least 50 cN/tex (BISFA, Chapter 7). The reinforcement layer moves between a rest configuration and a working configuration, and it and the tubular member are mutually configured so the reinforcement intercepts expansion to set maximum diameter and length.

What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text is explicitly an excerpt. It does not include the claims, the full description, drawings, embodiments, or the detailed description of the reinforcement's maximum elongation. It therefore does not establish the precise claimed scope, claim limitations, or any legal status conclusions. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is made here.

Generated 11/11/2026, 4:00:48 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11353143. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

1 active
Pending
Filed
Nov 10, 2026
Last modified
Nov 10, 2026
Petitioner
Teknor Apex Company
Inventor
Alessandro Mezzalira et al

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.