Patent 11338511

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Unified Patents LLC

1 active
Trial Instituted
Filed
Jul 18, 2025
Last modified
Jun 19, 2026
Petitioner
3D Systems Corporation et al.
Inventor
Ben Wynne et al

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

One AIA trial proceeding is on file for US Patent 11338511, currently in the "Trial Instituted" status. This means the patent's validity is actively being challenged before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and the claims have not yet been upheld or invalidated.

IPR2025-01242 — 3D Systems Corporation et al. v. Intrepid Automation Inc.

  • Type: Inter Partes Review
  • Filed: 2025-07-18
  • Status: Trial Instituted. This proceeding has passed the institution phase, and a trial has commenced before the PTAB.
  • Judge panel: Information not publicly available at this time.
  • Petition grounds: Information regarding specific claims challenged, prior art references, and statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) is not publicly available in the provided patent text or readily accessible via initial search.
  • Institution decision: The PTAB instituted a trial in this IPR. The specific date and detailed reasoning for institution are not publicly available in the provided patent text or readily accessible via initial search.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): Not yet issued. The status is "Trial Instituted," indicating the proceeding is ongoing. The statutory one-year deadline for a Final Written Decision from institution is approaching in 2026.
  • Settlement / termination: Not applicable, as the proceeding is currently active and instituted.
  • Appeal: Not applicable, as no Final Written Decision has been issued.
  • Defensive value: The institution of this IPR means that the patentability of challenged claims of US11338511 is currently under review by the PTAB. A defendant facing assertion of this patent should monitor this proceeding closely, as a final decision invalidating claims would significantly impact the patent owner's ability to assert them.

Strategic summary

Currently, the patent US11338511 is subject to one active Inter Partes Review, IPR2025-01242, filed by 3D Systems Corporation et al. The PTAB has instituted a trial in this proceeding, meaning that the Board found a reasonable likelihood that at least one challenged claim is unpatentable. Specific details regarding which claims are challenged, the prior art cited, and the grounds for institution are not publicly available in the provided context or readily accessible via initial search. Therefore, it is currently unknown which claims of 11338511 are specifically being tested in this IPR.

The estoppel landscape is not fully formed yet, as no Final Written Decision has been issued. Once a Final Written Decision is issued, § 315(e)(2) will bar the petitioner (and their privies) from asserting in other proceedings that a claim is invalid on any ground that the petitioner raised or reasonably could have raised during the IPR. Without knowing the specific grounds raised in the petition for IPR2025-01242, it is impossible to specify which prior-art grounds would be estopped for future defendants. The involvement of "3D Systems Corporation et al." as a petitioner suggests a potential industry competitor or a group defending against the patent.

Recommended next steps

  • As IPR2025-01242 is ongoing and in the "Trial Instituted" phase, a defendant should closely track the progress of this proceeding. The PTAB has a statutory deadline of one year from institution to issue a Final Written Decision. The institution date is not explicitly provided in the prompt, but given the filing date of 2025-07-18 and the last modified date of 2026-05-13, the institution decision likely occurred several months after filing. The Final Written Decision is expected by mid-2026 to early 2027, assuming a standard timeline.
  • Access the petition and institution decision documents for IPR2025-01242 through the USPTO PTAB E2E portal (https://ptab.uspto.gov/#/login) to determine the exact claims challenged, the prior art cited, and the PTAB's reasoning for institution. This information is crucial for understanding the potential impact on the patent's claims and for developing a defense strategy.
  • Monitor the PTAB case IPR2025-01242 via the Unified Patents portal: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2025-01242. This portal may provide updated status and links to relevant documents as they become public.

Generated 5/20/2026, 6:49:12 AM